“…However, when using () to design array antennas, applying these conventional normalization techniques partially hides essential aspects like angle‐of‐arrival (AOA)‐dependence, MC, and impedance matching. This follows from the fact that, when designing physical array antennas based on a QoS‐metric like the SINR, the impact of the antennas is typically embedded in the channel vectors
by means of, for example, embedded element patterns (EEPs) or a mutual coupling matrix (MCM), see, for example [
2, 5]. In other words, conventional power‐based normalization hides gain fluctuations induced by a (possibly poor) array design, as they are implicitly compensated for by the UE transmit powers.…”