2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1808.00769
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse and Dense Data with CNNs: Depth Completion and Semantic Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ma et al [8] used an early fusion scheme to combine sparse depth input with the corresponding RGB image, which was demonstrated to perform very well. On the other hand, Jaritz et al [7] argued that late-fusion performs better with their proposed architecture, which was also demonstrated in [5]. Wirges et al [15] used a combination of RGB images and surface normals to guide the process of depth upsampling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Ma et al [8] used an early fusion scheme to combine sparse depth input with the corresponding RGB image, which was demonstrated to perform very well. On the other hand, Jaritz et al [7] argued that late-fusion performs better with their proposed architecture, which was also demonstrated in [5]. Wirges et al [15] used a combination of RGB images and surface normals to guide the process of depth upsampling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hua and Gong [5] proposed a similar layer, which uses the trained convolution filter to normalize the sparse input. Contrarily, Jaritz et al [7] compared different architectures and argued that the use of validity masks degrades the performance due to the saturation of the masks at early layers within the CNN. This effect is avoided by the use of continuous confidences as proposed in our prior work on unguided depth completion [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations