2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spark-ignition engine performance with ‘Powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO/H2): A comparison with gasoline and natural gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction in brake torque by 14.2e19.6% is shown for the combustion of syngas relative to that of CNG. Such reduction is similar to that of reported by Mustafi et al [19] at 23% for a syngas of similar composition at the speed of 1500 RPM. The slight improvement in the current study is due to the directinjection fueling system.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reduction in brake torque by 14.2e19.6% is shown for the combustion of syngas relative to that of CNG. Such reduction is similar to that of reported by Mustafi et al [19] at 23% for a syngas of similar composition at the speed of 1500 RPM. The slight improvement in the current study is due to the directinjection fueling system.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The BSFC for the combustion of CNG is shown to be less sensitive to BMEP ranging 240e286 g/kWh at all loads and speeds. A similar trend was reported elsewhere [19]. The BSFC for the combustion of syngas is shown to be extremely sensitive to both the engine load and speeds.…”
Section: Performance Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Mustafi et al operated a single cylinder spark ignition engine using syngas as fuel [154]. Their study found that syngas produced about 30% less engine power output compared to petrol.…”
Section: Syngasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum brake power for the producer gas engine of 3.5 kW was obtained at 14:1 of CR and was unable to increase over 1700 rpm for all CRs considered. At 9.7:1 and 14:1 of CR, the engine showed deceleration due to low flammability and energy density of the producer gas, compared to gasoline or natural gas [20]. At CR of 17:1, the engine knock was occurred due possibly to the excessive CR.…”
Section: Engine Torque and Powermentioning
confidence: 98%