1984
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(84)90029-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparing and recovery of spatial alternation performance after entorhinal cortex lesions in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, supplementation with AJC at levels utilized herein has been demonstrated to prevent the reduction in acetylcholine and decline in cognitive performance that otherwise accompanies maintenance of mice on the deficient diet (16,24). In support of this possibility, cholinergic depletion itself is sufficient to induce impairments in memory in rodents (25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Notably, supplementation with AJC at levels utilized herein has been demonstrated to prevent the reduction in acetylcholine and decline in cognitive performance that otherwise accompanies maintenance of mice on the deficient diet (16,24). In support of this possibility, cholinergic depletion itself is sufficient to induce impairments in memory in rodents (25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Because of the robust plasticity in the hippocampus following partial deafferentation, several studies have explored the idea that injury-induced plasticity might underlie functional recovery. Early studies assessing axonal sprouting and changes in behavior (spontaneous or reinforced alternation) were controversial (Loesche and Steward, 1977;Scheff and Cotman, 1977;Olton et al, 1982;Ramirez and Stein, 1984). Subsequent studies using a variety of behavioral tasks have failed to show a clear relationship between injury-induced plasticity and functional recovery (Ramirez, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A 1.0 mA current was passed through the electrode for a period of 45 sec at each coordinate (Ramirez and Stein, 1984). Animals that received sham surgery were treated similarly, with the exception of the penetration of the electrode into the brain (note that all animals received rAAV vector injection).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%