2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16558-0_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPARDL: A Requirement Modeling Language for Periodic Control System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After we do the Event-B interpretation for the SPARDL, we have to answer if the interpretation rules proposed above are correct, which means that we have to ensure the EventB model can interpret the SPARDL model correctly. We have the detailed SPARDL operational semantics in [11], and we need to give the corresponding Event-B transition rules. Then we can give a theorem.…”
Section: Event-b Interpretations For Spardlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After we do the Event-B interpretation for the SPARDL, we have to answer if the interpretation rules proposed above are correct, which means that we have to ensure the EventB model can interpret the SPARDL model correctly. We have the detailed SPARDL operational semantics in [11], and we need to give the corresponding Event-B transition rules. Then we can give a theorem.…”
Section: Event-b Interpretations For Spardlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPARDL [11] is proposed to simulate the system on the model level. All of these leads to the goal of the system verification.…”
Section: Event-b Interpretations For Spardlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations