2015
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3222
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPARC Expression Did Not Predict Efficacy of nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine Alone for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in an Exploratory Analysis of the Phase III MPACT Trial

Abstract: Purpose: nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) in the phase III MPACT trial. This study evaluated the association of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) levels with efficacy as an exploratory endpoint.Experimental Design: Patients with previously untreated MPC (N ¼ 861) received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. Baseline SPARC level was measured in the tumor stroma and epithelia (archival biops… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
78
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
78
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) was reported to be a potential predictive biomarker of nab-paclitaxel efficacy in metastatic PC, but subsequent attempts to validate this biomarker failed in a larger scale study. (6) Given the poor outcomes associated with PC, NSCLC, and certain subtypes of breast cancer, novel therapies and biomarkers that predict efficacy are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) was reported to be a potential predictive biomarker of nab-paclitaxel efficacy in metastatic PC, but subsequent attempts to validate this biomarker failed in a larger scale study. (6) Given the poor outcomes associated with PC, NSCLC, and certain subtypes of breast cancer, novel therapies and biomarkers that predict efficacy are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high levels of tumoral SPARC was proposed as one mechanism for the efficacy of nanoparticulate albumin bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), owing to the capacity of SPARC to bind albumin, and in a Phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic, SPARC had positive association with efficacy (238, 239). However, in a mouse pancreatic cancer model, this binding effect was found to be saturable at low doses and not responsible for efficacy of the nab-paclitaxel (240).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the study was completed, the validity of expression of the ERCC protein by the previously used batches of 8F1 antibody could not be replicated in non-small cell lung cancer and has been replaced by newer methodology (26). The usefulness of SPARC is also in question as a subset analysis of mPC patients treated with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in the randomized MPACT trial did not show a benefit of treatment for SPARC overexpression (27). Additional MP was performed, with aCGH in 24 treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%