The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2007.690611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spanning Tests for Replicable Small-Cap Indexes as Separate Asset Classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The results of this analysis are presented in Table 6, Panels A, B and C. The findings indicate that each property type index is significant over the entire period, but that industrial and self storage are insignificant over the pre-crisis period and that office and lodging are insignificant over the crisis-results that are not consistent to those found when only stocks were part of the benchmark assets. Thus the results of our spanning tests confirm earlier studies that had demonstrated that traditional spanning tests may be sensitive to the choice of benchmarks assets used and the time horizon analyzed (Chen et al 2005, Chiang and Lee 2007and Switzer and Fan 2007.…”
Section: Spanning Regression Analysessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 The results of this analysis are presented in Table 6, Panels A, B and C. The findings indicate that each property type index is significant over the entire period, but that industrial and self storage are insignificant over the pre-crisis period and that office and lodging are insignificant over the crisis-results that are not consistent to those found when only stocks were part of the benchmark assets. Thus the results of our spanning tests confirm earlier studies that had demonstrated that traditional spanning tests may be sensitive to the choice of benchmarks assets used and the time horizon analyzed (Chen et al 2005, Chiang and Lee 2007and Switzer and Fan 2007.…”
Section: Spanning Regression Analysessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This iterative procedure is continued until the list of N test asset(s) is exhausted. The Wald likelihood ratio test and Lagrange multiplier test statistics are used to test the null hypothesis (See Switzer and Fan (2007)) for an extensive discussion).…”
Section: Long-run Analysis: Cointegration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrella (2005) and Switzer and Fan (2007) provide empirical evidence on the portfolio benefits of small caps in the presence of such more realistic investment policies. We follow their approach and test for the magnitude of the change in the variance of the global minimum variance portfolio and for the change in the sharpe ratio of the tangency portfolio, respectively, once hedge funds are added to the asset allocation process.…”
Section: Mean-variance Spanning Testsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whereas Switzer & Fan (2007) came to the result that the high returns of small caps could be country-specific (Switzer, 2010). Based on the results of Fa-ma & French (1993), that smaller and therefore riskier firms achieve higher returns than larger companies, Pandey & Sehgal (2016) identified several factors which caused the higher risk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%