Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in Mexican-Americans With Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries

Zelle, Boris A.; Francisco, Ben S.; Bossmann, James P.; Fajardo, Roberto J.; Bhandari, Mohit

doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000000789

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following initial screening of the titles and abstracts, 353 records were excluded, leaving 24 articles for full text review. Following full-text review of the 24 articles, six articles were included in this review [30–34] and details of the application of the eligibility criteria can be found in the PRISMA Diagram in Fig. 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As Table 4 demonstrates, none of the articles included here scored higher than adequate on the methodological quality assessment checklist. Whilst several articles [30–34] translated the PROM and then performed analyses of measurement properties on the translated PROM, these studies did not cross-culturally validate the translated PROMs using an analysis of measurement invariance. Therefore, it was not possible to determine any differences in scores secondary to cultural contextual factors and the box for cross-cultural validity was not deemed to be relevant in these instances.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The AAOS demonstrated low levels of evidence for sufficient construct validity. Zelle et al [34] correlated the scores of the AAOS-CS and AAOS-SCS with the scores of the SF-36 subscales: the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). The results of these four correlations performed met hypothesis 2 of the pre-defined hypotheses detailed in Table 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, the articles included here assessed differing populations with regard to fracture management; some assessed only operatively managed ankle fractures [26, 30, 33] and others included a mixture of operatively and non-operatively managed fractures [21, 31]. One article also included non-ankle fractures patients, which may have further confounded the results for the measurement properties assessed here [34]. Four of the included articles here were concerned with the OMAS [26, 30–33], only one article did so for the AAOS [34] and another one for the A-FORM [21], making it difficult to compare evidence between the three PROMs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One article also included non-ankle fractures patients, which may have further confounded the results for the measurement properties assessed here [34]. Four of the included articles here were concerned with the OMAS [26, 30–33], only one article did so for the AAOS [34] and another one for the A-FORM [21], making it difficult to compare evidence between the three PROMs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used for adults with an ankle fracture

McKeown

Ellard

Rabiu

et al. 2019

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAnkle fractures are painful and debilitating injuries that pose a significant burden to society and healthcare systems. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used outcome measures in clinical trials of interventions for ankle fracture but there is little evidence on their validity and reliability. This systematic review aims to identify and appraise evidence for the measurement properties of ankle specific PROMs used in adults with an ankle fracture using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) methodology.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL online databases for evidence of measurement properties of ankle specific PROMs. Articles were included if they assessed or described the development of the PROM in adults with ankle fracture. Articles were ineligible if they used the PROM to assess the measurement properties of another instrument. Abstracts without full articles and conference proceedings were ineligible, as were articles that adapted the PROM under evaluation without any formal justification of the changes as part of a cross-cultural validation or translation process. Two reviewers completed the screening. To assess methodological quality we used COSMIN risk of bias checklist and summarised evidence using COSMIN quality criteria and a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data for a sample of articles.ResultsThe searches returned a total of 377 articles. From these, six articles were included after application of eligibility criteria. These articles evaluated three PROMs: A-FORM, OMAS and AAOS. The A-FORM had evidence of a robust development process within the patient population, however lacks post-formulation testing. The OMAS showed sufficient levels of reliability, internal consistency and construct validity. The AAOS showed low quality evidence of sufficient construct validity.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of a particular PROM for use in adult ankle fracture research based on COSMIN methodology. Further validation of these outcome measures is required in order to ensure PROMs used in this area are sufficiently valid and reliable to assess treatment effects. This would enable high quality, evidenced-based management of adults with ankle fracture.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used for adults with an ankle fracture

McKeown

Ellard

Rabiu

et al. 2019

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Ankle fractures are commonly occurring fractures, especially in the aging population, where they often present as fragility fractures. The disease burden and economic costs to the patient and society are considerable. Choosing accurate outcome measures for the evaluation of the management of ankle fractures in clinical trials facilitates better decision-making. This systematic review assesses the evidence for the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the evaluation of adult patients with ankle fractures. Methods Searches were performed in CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar from the date of inception to July 2021. Studies that assessed the measurement properties of a PROM in an adult ankle fracture population were included. The included studies were assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of PROMs. Results In total, 13 different PROMs were identified in the 23 included articles. Only the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM) presented some evidence on content validity. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) displayed good evidence of construct validity and internal consistency. The measurement properties of the OMAS, LEFS and SEFAS were most studied. Conclusion The absence of validation studies covering all measurement properties of PROMs used in the adult ankle fracture population precludes the recommendation of a specific PROM to be used in the evaluation of this population. Further research should focus on validation of the content validity of the instruments used in patients with ankle fractures.

show abstract

Health Disparities in Advance Care Planning: Development of a Spanish-Language LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias)

Dassel,

Utz,

Sanchez-Birkhead

et al. 2023

Health Equity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The LEAD (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias) Guide is an advance care planning (ACP) tool for use within the context of dementia. To meet the needs of diverse communities, we sought to create a culturally sensitive and translated Latin American Spanish version of the guide. Methods: First, the guide was translated into Spanish. Second, we conducted forward and backward translations. Third, focus groups with Spanish-speaking Latino adults were held (healthy adults and current or previous dementia caregivers). Results: Descriptive analysis revealed three domains regarding the Latin American Spanish version of the LEAD Guide (LA LEAD Guide): (1) Family Dynamics (e.g., preventing family conflict), (2) Cultural Expectations (e.g., familial caregiving responsibility), and (3) Health Literacy (e.g., lack of knowledge about ACP). Discussion: This process created the Latin American LEAD Guide as a culturally and linguistically appropriate and acceptable ACP tool for older Latino adults. Health Equity Implications: The availability of culturally sensitive and Spanish ACP resources could facilitate greater health care access and research participation among Latino Americans by diminishing the linguistic and health literacy barriers for those not comfortably proficient in English.

show abstract

Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in Mexican-Americans With Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries

Abstract: We provide a Spanish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the AAOS-FAOQ. The instrument demonstrates appropriate psychometric properties in Mexican-Americans with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.

Cited by 5 publications

References 24 publications

A systematic review of the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used for adults with an ankle fracture

A systematic review of the measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures used for adults with an ankle fracture

Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties

Health Disparities in Advance Care Planning: Development of a Spanish-Language LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About