“…Theoretical explanations of the definiteness effect may be classified as to whether more or less abstract syntactic principles are invoked (e.g., Safir 1982;Longa et al 1996Longa et al , 1998Belletti 1987Belletti , 1988La Fauci and Loporcaro 1997;Rodríguez-Mondoñedo 2006, 2007a, 2007bBentley 2013), semantic ones (e.g., Milsark 1974Milsark , 1977Milsark , 1979Lumsden 1988;Blutner 1993;Enç 1991;Keenan 2003;Fischer 2016), or pragmatic-discursive ones (e.g., Abbott 1993Abbott , 2006Ward and Birner 1995;Zucchi 1995;Pons Rodríguez 2014). It is widely accepted, particularly in relation to Romance languages, that the theoretical complexity of the definiteness effect boils down to a conspiracy between syntactic, semantic, and discursive properties; Zucchi (1995Zucchi ( , 2003, McNally (1998McNally ( , 2016, or Leonetti (2008), for instance, acknowledge that the definiteness effect seems to be at the interplay between syntax, semantics, and some discursive-pragmatic factors.…”