Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 17th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2017)

García-Fernández, Francisco Javier; Criado, José Luis Ibáñez; Dorador, Aurelio Quesada

doi:10.1016/j.rec.2018.07.014

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La complejidad progresiva de las técnicas de ablación con catéter y el aumento del número de laboratorios y profesionales hacen cada vez más necesario disponer de datos fiables e independientes sobre los medios con que se realizan y sus resultados. El Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter, Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco (antes Sección de Electrofisiología y Arritmias) de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología, cuya decimonovena edición se presenta en este artículo, representa la mayor experiencia existente y llevada a cabo sin interrupción desde 2001 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 . Es un registro anual de ámbito nacional y carácter voluntario, en el que participan la práctica totalidad de las unidades de arritmias de nuestro país.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter. XIX Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2019)

Quesada

León

Anguera

2020

Revista Española de Cardiología

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción y objetivos Se describen los resultados del Registro Español de Ablación correspondientes al año 2019. Métodos La recogida de datos ha sido retrospectiva mediante la cumplimentación de un formulario de recogida de datos por cada uno de los centros participantes. Resultados Se han analizado los datos enviados por 102 centros, con un total de 18.549 procedimientos de ablación (el mayor de este registro) y con una media de 181,9 ± 137,0 y una mediana de 144,5 procedimientos por centro. Se consolida la ablación de fibrilación auricular como el sustrato abordado con más frecuencia (n = 5.164; 27,8%), que aumenta la distancia respecto al resto de sustratos. El segundo sustrato es el istmo cavotricuspídeo (n = 3.925; 21,1%) y el tercero, la taquicardia por reentrada intranodular (n = 3.768; 20,3%), desbancada del segundo puesto por aquel. La tasa total de éxito fue de nuevo del 91%; la de complicaciones mayores, del 1,9% y la mortalidad, del 0,03%. Se consolida el uso de navegadores (el 44,5% del total de procedimientos) y de los catéteres con tecnología de contacto en la fibrilación auricular (84,8%) y la taquicardia ventricular (90%). El 1,5% de las ablaciones se realizaron en pacientes pediátricos. Conclusiones El Registro Español de Ablación recoge de manera sistemática sin interrupción los procedimientos de ablación realizados en España, y permite observar a lo largo de los años un aumento progresivo del número de ablaciones manteniendo una alta tasa de éxito y unos porcentajes bajos de complicaciones.

show abstract

Section: Introductionunclassified

Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter. XIX Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2019)

Quesada

León

Anguera

2020

Revista Española de Cardiología

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The gains in the amount of procedures were also likely due to improved e ciencies of technology and work ow. The volume of ablations per Canadian centre has surpassed the volumes reported in the latest 2 European registries; in Spain, the mean procedures per centre was 156 ± 126 [12], and Germany reported a median of 297 ablations per centre [4]. There is a greater number of tertiary and lower volume centres in Europe as opposed to the larger academic centres in Canada, demonstrated by the wide range in the number of annual ablations per centre in Spain (2-568 procedures); and in Germany 11% of the centres had < 100 ablations per year; and only 60% of the centres had at least 200 annual catheter ablations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Canadian National Electrophysiology Ablation Registry Report 2011-2016

Kaoutskaia

Shurrab

Amit

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Purpose: Interventional cardiac electrophysiology (EP) is a rapidly evolving field in Canada; a nationwide registry was established in 2011 to conduct a periodic review of resource allocation. Methods: The registry collects annual data on EP lab infrastructure, imaging, tools, human resources, procedural volumes, success rates, and wait times. Leading physicians from each EP lab were contacted electronically; participation was voluntary. Results: All Canadian EP centres were identified (n=30); 50% and 45% of active centres participated in the last 2 instalments of the registry. A mean of 508±270 standard and complex catheter ablation procedures were reported annually for 2015-2016 by all responding centres. The most frequently performed ablation targets atrial fibrillation (PVI) arrhythmia accounting for 36% of all procedures (mean=164±85). The number of full time physicians ranges between 1 and 7 per centre, (mean=4). The mean wait time to see an electrophysiologist for an initial non-urgent consult is 23 weeks. The wait time between an EP consult and ablation date is 17.8 weeks for simple ablation, and 30.1 weeks for AF ablation. On average centres have 2 (range: 1-4) rooms equipped for ablations; each centre uses the EP lab an average of 7 shifts per week. While diagnostic studies and radiofrequency ablations are performed in all centres, point-by-point cryoablation is available in 85% centres; 38% of the respondents use circular ablation techniques. Conclusion: This initiative provides contemporary data on invasive electrophysiology lab practices. The EP registry provides activity benchmarks on national trends and practices.

show abstract

“…After AF, the most commonly treated arrhythmia with catheter ablation is AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), followed by atrial flutter and AVRT [6-8]. While AVNRTs are more common in women, AVRTs occur more frequently in men [3].…”

Section: Epidemiology Of Svtsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Have We Learned from the European Society of Cardiology 2019 Guidelines on Supraventricular Tachycardia

Babayiğit¹,

Ulus

Görenek

2020

Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are common arrhythmic conditions in clinical practice. Increased knowledge and experience on SVTs and some unclear situations in clinical practice led the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) team to write a new guideline. In this review, we touch upon the important points in the new ESC 2019 SVT guidelines and present changing approaches and suggestions. By providing a general review on SVTs, we also mention the basic mechanism, epidemiology, and clinical presentation of SVTs, approaching narrow and wide QRS tachycardias, SVTs in special patient groups, and treatment of SVTs.

show abstract

Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 17th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2017)

Cited by 12 publications

References 18 publications

Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter. XIX Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2019)

Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter. XIX Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2019)

Canadian National Electrophysiology Ablation Registry Report 2011-2016

What Have We Learned from the European Society of Cardiology 2019 Guidelines on Supraventricular Tachycardia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About