2021
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spammer group detection and diversification of customers’ reviews

Abstract: Online reviews regarding different products or services have become the main source to determine public opinions. Consequently, manufacturers and sellers are extremely concerned with customer reviews as these have a direct impact on their businesses. Unfortunately, to gain profit or fame, spam reviews are written to promote or demote targeted products or services. This practice is known as review spamming. In recent years, Spam Review Detection problem (SRD) has gained much attention from researchers, but stil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of the system to deal with scalability is still doubtful. After a detailed literature work, it has been observed that only a few works have been reported in the literature that deals with a huge amount of data using Big Data or Deep Learning [86], [87].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the system to deal with scalability is still doubtful. After a detailed literature work, it has been observed that only a few works have been reported in the literature that deals with a huge amount of data using Big Data or Deep Learning [86], [87].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hussain et al [20] make a significant addition to the field of spam identification in Roman Urdu scripts by providing insights and approaches for recognizing misleading product evaluations in the realm of spam review detection in Roman Urdu scripts. Similarly, Hussain et al [21,22] present a complete analysis of linguistic and spammer behavioral strategies for detecting spam reviews individually and in groups, providing useful insights and methods for efficiently addressing the problem. Duma et al [23] introduce a unique strategy that integrates review text, overall ratings, and aspect ratings to efficiently detect false reviews, highlighting the potential of a deep hybrid model in enhancing the accuracy of fake review detection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hussain et al [15], the DSR (Diversified Set of Reviews) technique, which chooses a diversified set of top-k evaluations with negative, positive, and unbiased reviews, was proposed by Hussainet al English and Roman Urdu real-world datasets are used for evaluation. The study suggests using Spammer Group Detection (SGD) identifies spam groups that may be questionable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check the effectiveness of GrFrauder, we compare three graph-based approaches. They are SGD [15], GGSpam [18], GSCPM [11]. In which GGSpam, GSCPM and SGD were performed on Yelp Datasets.…”
Section: Compared Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%