1959
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.116.382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spallation-Fission Competition in Heavy-Element Reactions:Th232+He4

Abstract: Cross sections and excitation functions have been determined for spallation and fiss-ion products from bombardments of Th 232 with helium ions (15 to 46 Mev) and u 2 33 with deuterons (9 to 24 Mev). This work extends a series of investigations of charged particle (a, d, and p) induced reactions in heavy elements (z ~ 88). Radiochemical methods were employed to isolate products corresponding to the following spallation reactions: neutron emis-, sion, (a,4n), (a,5n), (d,n), (d,2n), and (d,3n); emissionof one pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, conventional spallation-fission experiments are performed in direct kinematics [26][27][28][29] where the identification of the fission fragments in atomic number is a difficult task and only long-lived target materials can be studied. To overcome these difficulties, the inverse kinematics technique is better suited to unambiguously identify the products of the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, conventional spallation-fission experiments are performed in direct kinematics [26][27][28][29] where the identification of the fission fragments in atomic number is a difficult task and only long-lived target materials can be studied. To overcome these difficulties, the inverse kinematics technique is better suited to unambiguously identify the products of the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According t o Lindner and Turkevich (39), the yields of the products of the reactions, formally written as (p,3pxn), are considerably higher than predicted by the cascade-evaporation model (35,36), and they state that such products are perhaps produced by t h e reaction of the (p,apxn) type in which the cu-particle is knocked out of the nucleus during the cascade step, since the evaporation stage seems hardly likely to provide enough charged-particle emission in heavy elements bombarded with 340 Mev proton. Similarly, a t lower energies below 70 Mev, Foreman et al (49) suggest that (a,xpxn) reactions are formed by direct interaction with complex emitted in preference to a series of protons and neutrons. Thus a t low energies below 100 Mev, the large yields of the (p,2pxn) and (p,3pxn) reaction products in Tala1 can best be explained by direct interaction of the incoming particle with aggregates of like H3, He" He4, He6, Li5, Li6, Li7, etc., followed by evaporation of an appropriate number of neutrons, rather than by multiple emission of particles, unless an appreciable reduction of the Coulo~nb barrier, proposed only a t high energies of excitation (50,51), occurs even a t low excitation energies (48) permitting the evaporation of charged particles.…”
Section: Fig 3 Excitation Function For the Ta181(p3n)w179 Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 232U, for example, the ground-state band is known up to 6 + from work on 236pu a-decay and 232Np electron capture [5]. The peak value of the 232Th(a, 4n) reaction cross section at about 40 MeV is ~55 mb, while the fission cross section at that energy is about 1.3 b [6]. A few years ago, additional transitions have been tentatively assigned to the 232U ground-state band on the basis of an (a, 4n~,) experiment with a fission anticoincidence detector [7], though no information was obtained about the multipolarity and coincidence relationships of the transitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%