“…According t o Lindner and Turkevich (39), the yields of the products of the reactions, formally written as (p,3pxn), are considerably higher than predicted by the cascade-evaporation model (35,36), and they state that such products are perhaps produced by t h e reaction of the (p,apxn) type in which the cu-particle is knocked out of the nucleus during the cascade step, since the evaporation stage seems hardly likely to provide enough charged-particle emission in heavy elements bombarded with 340 Mev proton. Similarly, a t lower energies below 70 Mev, Foreman et al (49) suggest that (a,xpxn) reactions are formed by direct interaction with complex emitted in preference to a series of protons and neutrons. Thus a t low energies below 100 Mev, the large yields of the (p,2pxn) and (p,3pxn) reaction products in Tala1 can best be explained by direct interaction of the incoming particle with aggregates of like H3, He" He4, He6, Li5, Li6, Li7, etc., followed by evaporation of an appropriate number of neutrons, rather than by multiple emission of particles, unless an appreciable reduction of the Coulo~nb barrier, proposed only a t high energies of excitation (50,51), occurs even a t low excitation energies (48) permitting the evaporation of charged particles.…”