2012
DOI: 10.1505/146554812804715865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacing affects stem form, early growth and branching in young whitewood (Endospermum medullosum) plantations in Vanuatu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the mean occluded branch diameter decreased significantly with increasing planting density. Similar findings had already been recognized in previous studies not only for OBD in Pinus sylvestris [24] and Picea abies [25] but also for the diameter of dead or live branches in Douglas-fir [35,36], Endospermum medullosum [37] and Eucalyptus pilularis and E. grandis [38]. In addition, high density planting could significantly lower the percentage of large branches as shown in the present study (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, the mean occluded branch diameter decreased significantly with increasing planting density. Similar findings had already been recognized in previous studies not only for OBD in Pinus sylvestris [24] and Picea abies [25] but also for the diameter of dead or live branches in Douglas-fir [35,36], Endospermum medullosum [37] and Eucalyptus pilularis and E. grandis [38]. In addition, high density planting could significantly lower the percentage of large branches as shown in the present study (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, planting density had no significant effect on mean branch diameter and length, and only influenced the diameter of the largest branch. This was partly different from our previous studies on mid-aged B. alnoides [21], as well as studies on B. pendula [24], several Eucalyptus species [9,37,38], and Endospermum medullosum [16]. They all illustrated that mean branch size was significantly negatively correlated with planting density.…”
Section: Branch Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous factors influencing branch development; for example, nutrient [11,12], genotype [13][14][15], competition [16,17], etc. The main measures regulating branch development, such as artificial pruning [8,18] and stand density control [16,17,[19][20][21], have been used in practice for a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a stand develops, spacing strongly controls branch development (Kearney et al 2007;Alcorn et al 2007), stem growth and stand competition (West 2014;Glencross et al 2012), and therefore wood quality (Smith et al 2010) and log value (Cassidy et al 2012). At wider spacing branches are free to develop to the point where logs lose much of their value and harvest and log handling becomes expensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%