2014
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacetime Average Density (SAD) cosmological measures

Abstract: The measure problem of cosmology is how to obtain normalized probabilities of observations from the quantum state of the universe. This is particularly a problem when eternal inflation leads to a universe of unbounded size so that there are apparently infinitely many realizations or occurrences of observations of each of many different kinds or types, making the ratios ambiguous. There is also the danger of domination by Boltzmann Brains. Here two new Spacetime Average Density (SAD) measures are proposed, Maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(209 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These objections are based on the statement that distributions of initial conditions violate a widely accepted naturalness assumption that all forms of inflaton energy (kinetic, gradient, and potential) should initially have the same Planckian scale magnitude [19][20][21]. Three known sources of these distributions-pure no-boundary [1,2] and "tunneling" [3] quantum states of the universe and the Fokker-Planck equation for coarse-grained cosmological evolution [22][23][24][25]-in their turn suffer from intrinsic difficulties associated with a missing clear canonical quantization ground, insufficient amount of generated inflation, anthropic (observer dependence) problems [26][27][28], the rather contrived multiverse measure problem [29], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These objections are based on the statement that distributions of initial conditions violate a widely accepted naturalness assumption that all forms of inflaton energy (kinetic, gradient, and potential) should initially have the same Planckian scale magnitude [19][20][21]. Three known sources of these distributions-pure no-boundary [1,2] and "tunneling" [3] quantum states of the universe and the Fokker-Planck equation for coarse-grained cosmological evolution [22][23][24][25]-in their turn suffer from intrinsic difficulties associated with a missing clear canonical quantization ground, insufficient amount of generated inflation, anthropic (observer dependence) problems [26][27][28], the rather contrived multiverse measure problem [29], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is admittedly ad hoc, so a more elegant formulation should be found (see e.g. [20]), but at least Agnesi weighting combined with…”
Section: Weighting For the Integral Over Each Spacetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure problem of cosmology (see, e.g., [1,2,3,4]) is how to obtain probabilities of observations from the quantum state of the universe. This is particularly a problem when eternal inflation leads to a universe of unbounded size so that there are apparently infinitely many realizations or occurrences of observations of each of many different kinds or types, making the ratios ambiguous.…”
Section: The Measure Problem Of Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This year I have also proposed new measures depending on the Spacetime Average Density (SAD) of observation occurrences within a proper time t from a big bang or bounce [4]. When these measures are combined with…”
Section: Volume Weighting Versus Volume Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%