2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpaceANOVA: Spatial Co-occurrence Analysis of Cell Types in Multiplex Imaging Data Using Point Process and Functional ANOVA

Souvik Seal,
Brian Neelon,
Peggi M. Angel
et al.

Abstract: Multiplex imaging platforms have enabled the identification of the spatial organization of different types of cells in complex tissue or the tumor microenvironment. Exploring the potential variations in the spatial co-occurrence or colocalization of different cell types across distinct tissue or disease classes can provide significant pathological insights, paving the way for intervention strategies. However, the existing methods in this context either rely on stringent statistical assumptions or suffer from a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenge of gaps in the image is that it violates the assumption of homogeneity among the points in a spatial point pattern. One approach to address this is to incorporate a simulation envelope in which the cell-type labels are permuted ( Creed et al 2021 , Wilson et al 2021 , Seal et al 2024 ). This approach could be incorporated into SPOT, though the computational cost remains high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of gaps in the image is that it violates the assumption of homogeneity among the points in a spatial point pattern. One approach to address this is to incorporate a simulation envelope in which the cell-type labels are permuted ( Creed et al 2021 , Wilson et al 2021 , Seal et al 2024 ). This approach could be incorporated into SPOT, though the computational cost remains high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%