2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space use of a dominant Arctic vertebrate: Effects of prey, sea ice, and land on Pacific walrus resource selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However in sandy nearshore sediments of the north‐east Bering Sea, walruses excavated large individuals of the bivalve Mya truncata Linnaeus buried to a mean depth of 32 cm, the bivalve Macoma buried to a mean of 17 cm, and Serripes buried to a mean of 11 cm (Oliver et al, ). van Veen grabs such as ours do not sample these deeply buried bivalves, so evaluations of feeding habitat for walruses are incomplete (Beatty et al, ; Jay et al, ). Nevertheless, the presence of smaller (younger) bivalves near the sediment surface may indicate larger individuals buried deeper, and in the past, side‐scan sonar detected extensive areas of walrus feeding furrows in what appear to have been type‐3 habitats in the Chirikov Basin (Nelson & Johnson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in sandy nearshore sediments of the north‐east Bering Sea, walruses excavated large individuals of the bivalve Mya truncata Linnaeus buried to a mean depth of 32 cm, the bivalve Macoma buried to a mean of 17 cm, and Serripes buried to a mean of 11 cm (Oliver et al, ). van Veen grabs such as ours do not sample these deeply buried bivalves, so evaluations of feeding habitat for walruses are incomplete (Beatty et al, ; Jay et al, ). Nevertheless, the presence of smaller (younger) bivalves near the sediment surface may indicate larger individuals buried deeper, and in the past, side‐scan sonar detected extensive areas of walrus feeding furrows in what appear to have been type‐3 habitats in the Chirikov Basin (Nelson & Johnson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, important feeding habitat was delineated by a simulation model of prey densities needed by eiders to achieve energy balance (Lovvorn et al 2015). An alternative approach to mapping important habitats is use of resource selection functions that statistically relate telemetry locations of animals to environmental variables such as prey density, ice conditions or water depth (Dickson & Smith 2013; Beatty et al 2016). Although based on actual animal locations, the resource selection approach of comparing used versus unused areas can be compromised if ice cover, adverse weather or lack of omniscience about prey locations prevents the animals from occupying the better benthic habitats during periods when telemetry data are collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, polar bears have been observed attacking walruses hauled out on the coast in the fall, and Alaskan hunters have reported the consumption of spotted seals in winter (Voorhees, Sparks, Huntington, & Rode, ). The changing phenology of Arctic sea ice (Serreze, Crawford, Stroeve, Barrett, & Woodgate, ) is altering polar bear's behavior and habitat selection (Rode et al., ; Ware et al., ) and, combined with the ecosystem response to ice loss (e.g., Feng, Ji, Campbell, Ashjian, & Zhang, ; Moore, ), may be shifting the composition of prey species available to polar bears (e.g., Beatty et al., ; Galicia, Thiemann, Dyck, Ferguson, & Higdon, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changing phenology of Arctic sea ice (Serreze, Crawford, Stroeve, Barrett, & Woodgate, 2016) is altering polar bear's behavior and habitat selection Ware et al, 2017) and, combined with the ecosystem response to ice loss (e.g., Feng, Ji, Campbell, Ashjian, & Zhang, 2016;Moore, 2016), may be shifting the composition of prey species available to polar bears (e.g., Beatty et al, 2016;Galicia, Thiemann, Dyck, Ferguson, & Higdon, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%