Space-Time Trigonometry and Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Uniform and Accelerated Motions

Boccaletti, Dino; Catoni, F.; Catoni, Vincenzo

doi:10.1007/s00006-006-0015-6

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(28 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If in (4.6) K(τ ) = const. ≡ p −1 , the relations reported in [2] follow. Now we consider the straight-line OA which form with t axis the hyperbolic angle Motions (III)+(I) can be considered a round trip.…”

Section: Proper Time In Non-uniformly Accelerated Motionssupporting

confidence: 56%

“…This formalization allowed us to formalize, by means of elementary mathematics, the twin paradox for uniform as well as for uniformly accelerated motions [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We have changed the symbol p −1 , used in[1] and[2], with K(τ ), that recall the non-constant curvature of lines in Euclidean plane 4. Since n is pseudo-orthogonal to v it is space-like, then its modulus is negative 5.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Non-uniformly Accelerated Motions

Boccaletti

Catoni

2007

AACA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Proper Time In Non-uniformly Accelerated Motionssupporting

confidence: 56%

“…This formalization allowed us to formalize, by means of elementary mathematics, the twin paradox for uniform as well as for uniformly accelerated motions [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Non-uniformly Accelerated Motions

Boccaletti

Catoni

2007

AACA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, if one grants the latter viewpoint (to the reference frame of the space-traveler), the homebody should be younger 20 There are many papers (e.g. Ben-Ya'acov 2016;Franson 2016;Fung, Clark, Lewis, Wu 2016;de Wolf 2016;Garcia-Escartin, Chamorro-Posada 2015;Gasperini 2014;Lindkvist, Sabín, Fuentes, Dragan, Svensson, Delsing, Johansson 2014;Moreau, Devaux, Lantz 2014;Sokołowski, Golda 2014;2014a;Grøn 2013;Carvalho 2012;Friebe 2012;Ord 2012;Sfarti 2012;Sokołowski 2012;Boblest, Müller, Wunner 2011;Grøn, Braeck 2011;Lichtenegger, Iorio 2011;Székely 2010;Grandou, Rubin 2009;Müller, King, Adis 2008;Roukema, Bajtlik 2008;Abramowicz, Bajtlik, Kluźniak 2007;Boccaletti, Catoni, Catoni 2007;2007a;Grøn 2006;Kohler 2006;McCall 2006;Madarász, Németi, Székely 2006;Ghosal, Nepal, Das 2005;Pesic 2003;Soni 2002;Uzan, Luminet, Lehoucq, Peter 2002;Barrow, Levin 2001;Dolby, Gull 2001;Weeks 2001;Cranor, Heider, Price 2000;Schön 1998;…”

Section: Why Entanglement Was Neglectedmentioning

confidence: 99%

This Year's Nobel Prize (2022) in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: the New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

Penchev

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Niels Bohr's viewpoint (1935;1957) to the triple article can be interpreted. On the contrary, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen rather identified the classical quantum mechanics and quantum mechanics at all after Einstein's insight into the eventual nonempty complement of the former to the latter 38 as producing the outrageous "spooky action at a distance", more outrageous than which only the 2022 Nobel Prize can be for the reason that it awards experiments consecrating those nonlocal "ghosts" in physics as a respectable scientific truth.…”

Section: Quantum Mechanics With the Standard Model Versus Gen-eral Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: The New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

Пенчев¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement “establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science” in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of “classical” quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli’s “particle” paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals “spookily” (by Einstein’s flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein’s gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the “secondary quantization” of the Standard model. So, the experiments of entanglement once they have been awarded by the Nobel Prize launch particularly the relevant theory of quantum gravitation grounded on “quantum information science” thus granted to be nonclassical quantum mechanics in the shared framework of the generalized quantum mechanics obeying rather quantum-information conservation than only energy conservation. The concept of “dark phase” of the universe naturally linked to the very well confirmed “dark matter” and “dark energy” and opposed to its “light phase” inherent to classical quantum mechanics and the Standard model obeys quantum-information conservation, after which reversible causality or the mutual transformation of energy and information are valid. The mythical Big Bang after which energy conservation holds universally is to be replaced by an omnipresent and omnitemporal medium of decoherence of the dark and nonlocal phase into the light and local phase. The former is only an integral image of the latter and borrowed in fact rather from religion than from science. Physical, methodological and proper philosophical conclusions follow from that paradigm shift heralded by the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics. For example, the scientific theory of thinking should originate from the dark phase of the universe, as well: probably only approximately modeled by neural networks physically belonging to the light phase thoroughly. A few crucial philosophical sequences follow from the break of Pauli’s paradigm: (1) the establishment of the “dark” phase of the universe as opposed to its “light” phase, only to which the Cartesian dichotomy of “body” and “mind” is valid; (2) quantum information conservation as relevant to the dark phase, furthermore generalizing energy conservation as to its light phase, productively allowing for physical entities to appear “ex nihilo”, i.e., from the dark phase, in which energy and time are yet inseparable from each other; (3) reversible causality as inherent to the dark phase; (4) the interpretation of gravitation only mathematically: as an interpretation of the incompleteness of finiteness to infinity, for example, following the Gödel dichotomy (“either contradiction or incompleteness”) about the relation of arithmetic to set theory; (5) the restriction of the concept of hierarchy only to the light phase; (6) the commensurability of both physical extremes of a quantum and the universe as a whole in the dark phase obeying quantum information conservation and akin to Nicholas of Cusa’s philosophical and theological worldview.

show abstract

Space-Time Trigonometry and Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Uniform and Accelerated Motions

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Non-uniformly Accelerated Motions

Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Non-uniformly Accelerated Motions

This Year's Nobel Prize (2022) in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: the New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: The New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About