15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-2617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time residual distribution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a continuous representation of the solution is assumed the past-shield condition can be relaxed by the use of a pair of time layers [5]. If a second layer is introduced (see the diagram in the middle of Figure 1) and solved for at the same time as the first layer then it is only necessary to enforce upwinding in time in the first layer.…”
Section: Two-layer Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When a continuous representation of the solution is assumed the past-shield condition can be relaxed by the use of a pair of time layers [5]. If a second layer is introduced (see the diagram in the middle of Figure 1) and solved for at the same time as the first layer then it is only necessary to enforce upwinding in time in the first layer.…”
Section: Two-layer Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume now that u is continuous and has a piecewise linear variation in space and in time, and that its discrete values are stored at the nodes of the space-time mesh. The discrete fluctuation φ j,n is evaluated by combining the midpoint rule in time with exact integration in space (which can be carried out using an appropriate, conservative, linearisation) [5]. This gives a second order accurate representation of the fluctuation which can be written as…”
Section: Space-time Fluctuation Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless of the temporal scheme used, the original RDS formulation cannot be more than first order accurate in timedependent computations due to the inconsistency of the spatial discretization (Ferrante and Deconinck [8]). Various solutions have been proposed to overeóme this difficulty; see, e.g., Ferrante and Deconinck [8] and Caraeni [2], who made use of a finite-element like mass-matrix that were consistent with the spatial discretization, and Ricchiuto et al [16] and Csik and Deconinck [4], who introduce space-time residual distribution schemes. But, all of these papers are focused on inviscid unsteady solutions, with non-steady viscous computation not conclusive (Caraeni et al [3]) and putting more emphasis on the numerical aspect of the method than in its real predictive capabilities for complex viscous flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%