2014
DOI: 10.1515/cmam-2014-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-Time Residual-Based A Posteriori Estimators for the A−ϕ Magnetodynamic Formulation of the Maxwell System

Abstract: In this paper, an a posteriori residual error estimator is proposed for the A−ϕ magnetodynamic Maxwell system given in its potential and space/time formulation and solved by a finite element method. The reliability as well as the efficiency of the estimator are established for several norms. Then, numerical tests are performed, allowing to illustrate the obtained theoretical results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the reliability and efficiency's properties lead to deduce the equivalence between the estimator and a suitable error energy norm [3].…”
Section: B Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In conclusion, the reliability and efficiency's properties lead to deduce the equivalence between the estimator and a suitable error energy norm [3].…”
Section: B Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For each of them, the proof of their well-posedness and some properties on the corresponding solutions are detailed in [3,Sec. 2].…”
Section: B Potential Weak Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More particularly, we have in mind to derive a weak formulation that will be used for the numerical resolution of (8) by the Finite Element Method in the context of electromagnetic problems. [4] Concerning the harmonic formulation of some Maxwell problems, several contributions have been proposed in the last decade. In that case, since no time derivatives are involved, we have only to deal with spatial problems for which existence results are easier to obtain (see for instance Theorem 2.1 in [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%