2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10064-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-Time Models in Stochastic Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the strongest form of separability may be defined by the requirement that the distribution of a STPP is equal to the product of the distributions of the marginal processes in space and time. This form of separability is equivalent to the independence of the spatial and temporal components of the point process, and under this separability, the spatial and temporal components can be modeled completely separately (Beneš et al;. Diggle (2013, page 220) uses the term no spatio-temporal interaction for a point process with independent spatial and temporal components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the strongest form of separability may be defined by the requirement that the distribution of a STPP is equal to the product of the distributions of the marginal processes in space and time. This form of separability is equivalent to the independence of the spatial and temporal components of the point process, and under this separability, the spatial and temporal components can be modeled completely separately (Beneš et al;. Diggle (2013, page 220) uses the term no spatio-temporal interaction for a point process with independent spatial and temporal components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was further developed by Møller & Ghorbani (). With a well‐defined space‐time K ‐function, parameter estimation of an inhomogeneous space‐time SNCP may be performed by a two‐step estimation procedure with minimum contrast estimation in the second step as discussed by Beneš et al (). Such a procedure is a generalization from the purely spatial case, which was discussed by Waagepetersen & Guan ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a procedure is a generalization from the purely spatial case, which was discussed by Waagepetersen & Guan (). However, the main problem, identified by Beneš et al (), is the higher dimensionality of the space‐time K ‐function and the consequent low stability of its non‐parametric estimate. This makes the minimum contrast estimation numerically unstable even for point patterns including several hundreds of points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where κ is a kernel function (weight) and L is a non-negative Lévy basis (see Beneš et al, 2015;Hellmund et al, 2008), we have a spatio-temporal Lévy-driven Cox process. Under some regularity conditions, Λ has an equivalent shot-noise representation (Møller, 2003) with additional random noise.…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Stationary Poisson Cluster and Shotnoise Coxmentioning
confidence: 99%