Authorea
DOI: 10.22541/au.158093489.92340788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferentially sampling sites downstream (which may represent 'eDNA reservoirs'; Sales et al, 2021) does not seem to represent an optimal sampling strategy for species which are not fully aquatic based on the results presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Preferentially sampling sites downstream (which may represent 'eDNA reservoirs'; Sales et al, 2021) does not seem to represent an optimal sampling strategy for species which are not fully aquatic based on the results presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Information from eDNA often needs to be followed up with traditional surveys, but eDNA can help guide these surveys in the right direction (Rose et al 2019;Ji et al 2020;Sales et al 2020).…”
Section: Minimum Sequence Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional surveys are also generally labor intensive and time consuming, and can be inefficient at detecting the true biodiversity present (van der Heyde et al ;Basset et al 2012;Gómez-Zurita et al 2016;Stoeckle et al 2016;Evans et al 2017b;Rodriguez-Estrella et al 2019;Zhang et al 2020b). The advent of rapid and relatively cheap DNA sequencing techniques has significantly enhanced biodiversity research by overcoming some of the challenges of labor-intensive traditional surveys and offering the opportunity to efficiently characterize biodiversity in time and space, using standardized methods (Corlett 2017;Alexander et al 2020;Cowart et al 2020;Ji et al 2020;Leempoel et al 2020;Sales et al 2020;Yang & Zhang 2020). Among these techniques, environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling has attracted worldwide attention, and interest in using this tool for biodiversity assessment has grown rapidly in the past few years (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…eDNA technology has been shown to be useful in spatial and temporal monitoring in a wide variety of settings, as the methods are relatively inexpensive, reliable and quicker than conventional monitoring (Lecaudey et al 2019;Preissler et al 2019;Reinhardt et al 2019;Sutter and Kinziger 2019;Sales et al 2020). The breakthrough in eDNA barcoding technology is in its ability to monitor the ecosystem without causing unnecessary harm to ecosystem or their organisms by non-invasive sampling strategy (Antognazza et al 2019;Mora et al 2019;Leempoel et al 2020) and to detect elusive, rare, and cryptic species effectively even in low density occurrences (Franklin et al 2019;Shelton et al 2019;Takahara et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%