DOI: 10.5204/thesis.eprints.116473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space, Time, Creativity, and the Changing Character of the Recording Studio: Spatiotemporal Attitudes Toward 'DIY' Recording

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many studies on the architectural spaces of large-format studios, the studio's interaction with the microphones and music and the way that interaction has changed over time (see Bates 2012;Hennion 1989;Williams 2006). DIY recording has seen some investigation (see Auvinen 2016Auvinen , 2017Théberge 1997;Watson et al 2009), without attention to the recording space specifically (Goold 2018). This research combines participant observation with a practice-led approach to provide a platform to qualitatively test theories of space as experienced by artists engaged in the recording process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many studies on the architectural spaces of large-format studios, the studio's interaction with the microphones and music and the way that interaction has changed over time (see Bates 2012;Hennion 1989;Williams 2006). DIY recording has seen some investigation (see Auvinen 2016Auvinen , 2017Théberge 1997;Watson et al 2009), without attention to the recording space specifically (Goold 2018). This research combines participant observation with a practice-led approach to provide a platform to qualitatively test theories of space as experienced by artists engaged in the recording process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIY recording has seen some investigation (see Auvinen 2016, 2017; Théberge 1997; Watson et al . 2009), without attention to the recording space specifically (Goold 2018). This research combines participant observation with a practice-led approach to provide a platform to qualitatively test theories of space as experienced by artists engaged in the recording process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%