1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space‐Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point‐based Framework

Abstract: Conventional integral measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
544
0
37

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 899 publications
(587 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
544
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Data on outdoor recreation facilities are not available EU-wide, therefore it is assumed that water attractiveness decreases as the distance from the coast increases, being high in the vicinity of water, in a buffer within which recreation facilities (including summer houses) can be found. Such distance in the presented work is set at 2000 m. Coastlines of sea and lakes have been extracted from CLC2000 dataset, and a S-shaped impedance function has been used to calculate attractiveness (Kwan, 1998;Geurs and Ritsema, 2001). The following inverse logistic function (1) has been applied to all coastlines:…”
Section: Recreation Potential Indicator (Rpi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Data on outdoor recreation facilities are not available EU-wide, therefore it is assumed that water attractiveness decreases as the distance from the coast increases, being high in the vicinity of water, in a buffer within which recreation facilities (including summer houses) can be found. Such distance in the presented work is set at 2000 m. Coastlines of sea and lakes have been extracted from CLC2000 dataset, and a S-shaped impedance function has been used to calculate attractiveness (Kwan, 1998;Geurs and Ritsema, 2001). The following inverse logistic function (1) has been applied to all coastlines:…”
Section: Recreation Potential Indicator (Rpi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kaufmann et al (2004) have offered one of the most thorough descriptions of mobility potential, describing it as a resource composed of interdependent elements of access, competence, and appropriation (Kaufmann et al, 2004). Rooted in Hägerstrand's space-time prisms (Golledge and Stimson, 1997) and other concepts such as potential path space or area (Miller, 1991, Kwan, 1998, "access" represents the set of opportunities and locations from which individuals can choose to participate in an activity. The "competence" element encompasses the physical abilities and skills needed to exploit mobility options, while "appropriation" refers to decision-making processes, evaluation of mobility options, and the adoption of a course of action which will eventually be enacted through agency (Kaufmann et al, 2004).…”
Section: Daily Mobility Potential: An Unequally Distributed Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These temporal contexts or situations have been examined in, among others, time geography (Dijst, 2009b;Ha« gerstrand, 1970;Kwan, 1998). The basic idea is that each individual and other organisms and material objects follow an uninterrupted path through time and across space, which together form various networks.…”
Section: Contextualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%