2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2022.100521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time analysis of COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 wastewater loading: A geodemographic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5c, d). This result is also consistent with recent studies (Haak et al 2022;Nelson et al 2022). It can be recognized that the application of the Gi* model can reveal the potential disease risk as well as explain the underlying origin of the infection with high certainty.…”
Section: Identi Cation Of Hot Spot Clusterssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…5c, d). This result is also consistent with recent studies (Haak et al 2022;Nelson et al 2022). It can be recognized that the application of the Gi* model can reveal the potential disease risk as well as explain the underlying origin of the infection with high certainty.…”
Section: Identi Cation Of Hot Spot Clusterssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, daily sampling would not be feasible for most communities, nor would it be cost‐effective. Sampling twice per week for SARS‐CoV‐2 was determined to be sufficient to avoid detection inaccuracies and was sufficient to correlate with a 7‐ to 8‐day lag time in case detection at two Austin WWTPs (Feng et al 2021; Nelson et al 2022). In El Paso, a nearly weekly sampling approach had a 4‐ to 24‐day lag time (Gitter et al 2023); therefore, a biweekly sampling strategy would be more practical when limited resources and personnel are considered, especially in a rural community (Feng et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large volume for collections (1-2 L) especially when low incidence of COVID cases is expected Ahmed et al 2022 Composite influent samples over a 24-hr period sampled one to two days per week at 12 WWTPs and daily for five days per week for two WWTPs A three-day per week sampling frequency evenly spaced apart will not compromise surveillance and a non-consecutive two-day per week frequency has minimal impact on surveillance sufficient to correlate with a 7-to 8-day lag time in case detection at two Austin WWTPs (Feng et al 2021;Nelson et al 2022). In El Paso, a nearly weekly sampling approach had a 4-to 24-day lag time (Gitter et al 2023); therefore, a biweekly sampling strategy would be more practical when limited resources and personnel are considered, especially in a rural community (Feng et al 2021).…”
Section: Ahmed Et Al 2022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water quality researchers might find utility in these data examining freshwater systems and discharge locations. With the sewershed boundaries, researchers now have estimates for where sewer systems border or even cross waterways enabling inclusion of these data in research plans as has been done before [9]. In addition, hydrology research can use these data to understand the flow of wastewater to treatment plants from communities and potential relationships with topography and hydrography [31].…”
Section: Applications For Public Health Research and Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing information on infectious disease threats to public health [6], testing wastewater can inform understanding of the burden of opioid and other drug use in a community [7]. Linking the population to the wastewater sample is a key step in WBE [8,9], as accurate population estimates are needed to understand what is found in wastewater in terms of population-level burden and create statistical models that use these data [10]. Linking the sample to the population is also necessary for precise public health intervention if an outbreak is detected [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%