2023
DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space Resources and the Politics of International Regime Formation

Abstract: Space resources such as minerals or lunar ice deposits are of growing economic and political interest in the context of the emerging space economy and the intensifying geopolitical tensions of a new "space race". Scholars and stakeholders increasingly engage with the question of how to regulate the future exploration and exploitation of space resources under international law. A potential option that has drawn broad attention in the debate is a multilateral regime that would regulate space resources as the com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, various economic incentives have been proposed to address market limitations. For instance, centralized governance approaches and multi-actor coalitions might reduce market competition to promote cleanup (Klima et al, 2018;Rabitz, 2023). Taxes on orbital uses (Rao et al, 2020), satellite launches (Rouillon, 2020), and debris production (Bernhard et al, 2023) have been proposed to preserve the value of satellites in LEO while maintaining a relatively debris-free environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, various economic incentives have been proposed to address market limitations. For instance, centralized governance approaches and multi-actor coalitions might reduce market competition to promote cleanup (Klima et al, 2018;Rabitz, 2023). Taxes on orbital uses (Rao et al, 2020), satellite launches (Rouillon, 2020), and debris production (Bernhard et al, 2023) have been proposed to preserve the value of satellites in LEO while maintaining a relatively debris-free environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing space infrastructures are already deeply entrenched in Earthly governance structures and have the potential to further exploit existing power dynamics. So, in the process of discussing potential regimes, may they be around Earth's orbit (X. S. Yap & Truffer, 2022), space resources (Rabitz, 2023) or the Moon (Tepper & Whitehead, 2018), considering the underlying processes already in place can provide important considerations regarding implicit consequences. As previously discussed, the key legal framework on which most outer space exploration is based is the Outer Space Treaty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly relied-on treaty up to date, the Outer Space Treaty (OST) dates from 1967, is party by 144 nations, and sets global principles for the exploration of outer space (UN, 2023). However, it provides very little universally agreed-upon binding legislation and the OST does not explicitly address issues regarding space debris, property in space, mining in space, and other commercial activities (Rabitz, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that approaching outer space as a global commons remains a project to be continuously constructed and institutionalized. Meanwhile, Rabitz (2023) discusses the potential formation of multilateral regimes for space resources and articulates why the prospects of just, effective, and efficient solutions are limited based on our current knowledge of governance of global commons. These articles demonstrate the need and urgency for international agreements for dealing with the rapid rise in satellite activities or before the mineral rush in space takes off.…”
Section: Advancing the Debate With This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%