2001
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/18/17/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space missions to detect the cosmic gravitational-wave background

Abstract: Abstract. It is thought that a stochastic background of gravitational waves was produced during the formation of the universe. A great deal could be learned by measuring this Cosmic Gravitational-wave Background (CGB), but detecting the CGB presents a significant technological challenge. The signal strength is expected to be extremely weak, and there will be competition from unresolved astrophysical foregrounds such as white dwarf binaries. Our goal is to identify the most promising approach to detect the CGB.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
112
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(45 reference statements)
4
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the limits from ground-based interferometers from the final science run of Initial LIGO-Virgo, the co-located detectors at Hanford (H1-H2), Advanced LIGO (aLIGO) O1, and the projected design sensitivity of the advanced detector network assuming two years of coincident data, with constraints from other measurements: CMB measurements at low multipole moments [60], indirect limits from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis [61,62], pulsar timing [62], and from the ringing of Earth's normal modes [63]. We also show projected limits from a space-based detector such as LISA [59,64,65], following the assumptions of [59]. We extend the BNS and BBH distributions using an f 2/3 power-law down to low frequencies, with a low-frequency cut-off imposed where the inspiral time-scale is of order the Hubble scale.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the limits from ground-based interferometers from the final science run of Initial LIGO-Virgo, the co-located detectors at Hanford (H1-H2), Advanced LIGO (aLIGO) O1, and the projected design sensitivity of the advanced detector network assuming two years of coincident data, with constraints from other measurements: CMB measurements at low multipole moments [60], indirect limits from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis [61,62], pulsar timing [62], and from the ringing of Earth's normal modes [63]. We also show projected limits from a space-based detector such as LISA [59,64,65], following the assumptions of [59]. We extend the BNS and BBH distributions using an f 2/3 power-law down to low frequencies, with a low-frequency cut-off imposed where the inspiral time-scale is of order the Hubble scale.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the sake of comparison, the measured O1 PI curve at α = 0 is 1.6 times larger than the projected PI curve at α = 0 using the projections in [58] and 29.85 days of live time, which is fairly good agreement between predicted and achieved sensitivity. Finally, in red we present the projected sensitivity of a space-based detector with similar sensitivity to LISA, using the PI curve presented in [59] computed using the projections in [64,65].…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of our review follows from the comprehensive discussions in Misner et al (1973), Thorne (1980Thorne ( , 1987, Flanagan & Hughes (1998a, 1998b, and Cornish & Larson (2001). We refer the reader to these resources for details.…”
Section: Gravity Waves From Individual Mergersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising avenue for shedding light on the SBH formation mystery is the possible detection of the gravitational waves emitted from mergers during their hierarchical assembly ( Thorne & Braginsky 1976). A space-based, interferometric gravity wave detector, such as the proposed LISA interferometer, should be capable of detecting such merger events (Thorne 1995(Thorne , 1996Flanagan & Hughes 1998a, 1998bCornish & Larson 2001). For such an instrument, mergers of BHs with masses M BH k 10 3 M at redshifts from z $ 0-30 will be observable as strain perturbations, providing a new test of the viability of SBH growth through mergers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorrect expressions for the overlap reduction function have appeared in the recent literature [17,18] and, with them, incorrect conclusions regarding the sensitivity of proposed gravitational wave detectors to stochastic gravitational waves. These errors have lead to significantly flawed appraisals of the high-frequency sensitivity of the Big Bang Observer to a stochastic gravitational wave background, including spurious nulls in the frequency-dependent detector response and a reduced estimate of the signal-to-noise ratio as a function of the gravitational-wave power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%