2010
DOI: 10.1080/09668131003736995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space, Kinship Networks and Youth Transition in Provincial Russia: Negotiating Urban–Rural and Inter-Regional Migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, existing contacts in the city were considered resources of support and were utilized by young people in order to find work or a place to live in the city. Similar tendencies have been noted in other post-socialist countries (see Roberts et al, 2000;Glendinning et al, 2004;White, 2007;Walker, 2010). Glendinning et al (2004: 39), for example, found prospects for migration amongst young people in rural parts of Novosibirsk Oblast e in Siberia to be fundamentally tied to their kinship networks, and suggested that the assistance of siblings who had already moved away was a crucial resource.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, existing contacts in the city were considered resources of support and were utilized by young people in order to find work or a place to live in the city. Similar tendencies have been noted in other post-socialist countries (see Roberts et al, 2000;Glendinning et al, 2004;White, 2007;Walker, 2010). Glendinning et al (2004: 39), for example, found prospects for migration amongst young people in rural parts of Novosibirsk Oblast e in Siberia to be fundamentally tied to their kinship networks, and suggested that the assistance of siblings who had already moved away was a crucial resource.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In other post-socialist countries similar tendencies can be noted. In particular young people, as White (2010) and Walker (2010) have argued, see migration as the only option left for making the most of the new opportunities, increasing their social status, or sometimes simply for survival (see also Walker and Stephenson, 2010).…”
Section: Estonia and Transitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Instead, coping mechanisms such as economies of favours (Kuehnast and Dudwick, 2004;, informal/undeclared work (Stenning, 2005;Round, 2007, 2010), 'social acknowledgement' (Morris, 2011: 629), gift exchange (Mauss, 2002), social capital (Moran, 2001;, blat (Onoshchenko and Williams, 2013), social networks (Grabher and Stark, 1997;Lonkila, 1997Lonkila, , 1999Walker, 2010) and memory (Buyandelgeriyn, 2008) have all helped circumvent the challenges of post-Soviet everyday life.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Estrategias tales como el trabajo informal (Stenning, 2005;y Williams & Round, 2007), la economía de favores (Pavlovskaya, 2004;Kuehnast & Dudwick, 2004;Polese, 2008), el "reconocimiento social" (Morris, 2011(Morris, : 629, 2012, el intercambio de regalos (Mauss, 2002;Polese, 2015;Stan, 2011), la memoria (Buyandelgeriyn, 2008) y las redes sociales o de parentesco (Grabher & Stark, 1997;Lonkkila, 1997;1999;Walker, 2010) no solo han ayudado a navegar a través del "día a día" post-soviético (Bruns, 2012;Morris, 2012;Polese, 2006;Round & Williams, 2012;Urunboyev, 2013;Sasunkievich, 2014). Igualmente han permitido, y ello probablemente sea lo más importante, revelar la existencia de un sistema completo en el cual la "informalidad ha llegado para quedarse" (Morris & Polese, 2014: 1).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified