2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-geodetic and water level gauge constraints on continental uplift and tilting over North America: regional convergence of the ICE-6G_C (VM5a/VM6) models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A host of improvements in global GIA models have evolved over the past decades. New models (including the ICE‐6G model, Peltier et al, ; Purcell et al,; Roy & Peltier, , and the latest version of the Australian National University (ANU) model, Lambeck et al, , ) use considerably more data that constrain moraine position and dating during the ice sheet collapse phase (e.g., Gowan et al, ; Simon et al, ; Tarasov et al, ). Space geodesy has a growing role (Milne et al, ), along with an ever greater volume of relative sea level (RSL) data (Murray‐Wallace & Woodroffe, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A host of improvements in global GIA models have evolved over the past decades. New models (including the ICE‐6G model, Peltier et al, ; Purcell et al,; Roy & Peltier, , and the latest version of the Australian National University (ANU) model, Lambeck et al, , ) use considerably more data that constrain moraine position and dating during the ice sheet collapse phase (e.g., Gowan et al, ; Simon et al, ; Tarasov et al, ). Space geodesy has a growing role (Milne et al, ), along with an ever greater volume of relative sea level (RSL) data (Murray‐Wallace & Woodroffe, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our results herein and in SP establish the ice dynamical consistency of the present version of I6G, this clearly does not preclude the consistency of alternative scenarios that refine I6G (e.g., by incorporating Laurentide and Fennoscandian contributions to MWP1b). Refinements along these lines have already been described by Roy and Peltier (, ), and each new “canonical” ICE‐ x G reconstruction can, naturally, become a new basis for further studies of ice dynamical smoothing. Roy and Peltier (, ) considered adjustments that either uniformly or nonuniformly modulated the time dependence of North American ice thickness over the interval of interest, and examination of the spatial structure of ice core climate adjustments, δ I (Figure ), suggests that MWP1b ice losses would more likely have been concentrated in southern, warm climate regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Refinements along these lines have already been described by Roy and Peltier (, ), and each new “canonical” ICE‐ x G reconstruction can, naturally, become a new basis for further studies of ice dynamical smoothing. Roy and Peltier (, ) considered adjustments that either uniformly or nonuniformly modulated the time dependence of North American ice thickness over the interval of interest, and examination of the spatial structure of ice core climate adjustments, δ I (Figure ), suggests that MWP1b ice losses would more likely have been concentrated in southern, warm climate regions. Weakly nudged results with τ f =1,000 years predict ice core climate adjustments of the appropriate amplitude, but the aforementioned observational inconsistencies in these results suggest a breakdown of the perturbative approach described herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare our data to the predictions of the recent ICE-5G and ICE-6G models (Peltier, 2004;Peltier et al, 2015), and also to models we compute for a range of viscosity structures using the older ICE-3G model. Because our study area is distal to the main ice sheets and has consistently remained ice free, the predicted present-day vertical motions are small and are relatively insensitive to details regarding the ice history and geometry (e.g., Love et al, 2016 ;Roy & Peltier, 2015, 2017Sato et al, 2011Sato et al, , 2012Yousefi et al, 2018). Using a wide range of input model Alaska uplift is due to subduction that is compounded by isostatic rebound from glacial ice loss.…”
Section: Gia Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%