2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16250-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-Division Multiplexing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements of σ MDL,dB agree well with the theoretical prediction (2) from [21] when a value of σ g,dB = 0.30 dB is used for the per span σ MDL,dB of the 7C-MCF, which is lower than σ g,dB = 0.36 dB of the 4C-MCF. The practical impact of the MDL is reported in [38] and [104], and for an acceptable capacity reduction of 10% at a 10 −4 outage probability, a distance over 10 000 km can be achieved for the span configuration reported in [24].…”
Section: Fig 21 Q-factors For Ultralow-loss Large-effective-area Smf ...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurements of σ MDL,dB agree well with the theoretical prediction (2) from [21] when a value of σ g,dB = 0.30 dB is used for the per span σ MDL,dB of the 7C-MCF, which is lower than σ g,dB = 0.36 dB of the 4C-MCF. The practical impact of the MDL is reported in [38] and [104], and for an acceptable capacity reduction of 10% at a 10 −4 outage probability, a distance over 10 000 km can be achieved for the span configuration reported in [24].…”
Section: Fig 21 Q-factors For Ultralow-loss Large-effective-area Smf ...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the complexity can also be reduced by using digital subcarrier modulation, practically reducing the symbol rate of the transmitted subcarrier, which results in a smaller number of taps that have to be optimized for each subcarrier [103]. The evolution of the MDL as a function of the distance was also investigated, as it can have a significant impact on the transmitted capacity [104]. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 21 Q-factors For Ultralow-loss Large-effective-area Smf ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD, just like PMD, is responsible for introducing frequency dependence into the random mode coupling process, and being a unitary phenomenon, in principle, it does not affect the system capacity in the linear transmission regime. Yet, since the average delay spread produced by MD is greater by two or three orders of magnitude than that produced by PMD in the same length of fiber, the increase in receiver complexity that it entails is considerable [158]. The large MD implies that the frequency correlation of mode-related phenomena becomes very short.…”
Section: B Coupled-mode Sdm Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coupled-core MCFs the cores are arranged rather closely to each other, so that the fields propagating in the individual cores couple to each other to a non-negligible extent [1]. For suitable values of the core-to-core distances, inter-core coupling takes the form of a random process, owing to the fact that the perturbations to the ideal fiber structure take over the deterministic coupling dictated by coupled-mode theory [2], [3]. The random coupling between cores is known to be beneficial for two main reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%