Proceedings 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2003)
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2003.1225145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space debris capture by a joint compliance controlled robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is intended that medium-size debris, if not fully arrested by the membrane, will be sufficiently retarded by it and go through the structure without damaging it. The overall compliance of the device is also advantageous for absorbing part of the impact energy of the debris, as it has been demonstrated for a compliant space manipulator in debris capture (Nishida and Yoshikawa (2003)).…”
Section: Tessellated Cupola Unfoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is intended that medium-size debris, if not fully arrested by the membrane, will be sufficiently retarded by it and go through the structure without damaging it. The overall compliance of the device is also advantageous for absorbing part of the impact energy of the debris, as it has been demonstrated for a compliant space manipulator in debris capture (Nishida and Yoshikawa (2003)).…”
Section: Tessellated Cupola Unfoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is common to assume that the positioning of an outline is performed by the rendezvous control of the flight function of a satellite. Furthermore, 0.1 m or less is acceptable as the accuracy of the rendezvous control by using the stereo visual-measurement system [8,9]. Hence, the range of the attitude adjustment angle of the capture mechanism in which the position adjustment by robot arm operation is required is relatively small.…”
Section: Composition Of a Capture Robot Armmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several incidents producing the high number of debris. Two of them have been especially severe: (i) A 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test producing more than 1200 catalogued pieces of debris and an estimated 35,000 pieces of a size of 1 cm and larger, resulting in the most severe orbital debris cloud in history (NPDPO, 2009) (ii) the collision of the Iridium-33 and Kosmos-2251 satellites in 2009, which was the first accidental hypervelocity collision of two intact spacecraft (Nishida and Yoshikawa, 2003). Fig.…”
Section: Recent Debris Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timeline of the growth in the number of objects being tracked in orbit. Due to limited tracking capabilities (limited to larger than 10 cm), the actual number of objects in orbit is estimated to be 2 to 3 times the numbers in the figure (Nishida and Yoshikawa, 2003) Total objects Currently, collisions are the smallest contributor to fragments of debris. However, as the number of debris objects increases, collisions become more likely, thus creating yet more debris (COPUOS, 2007).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%