2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11476-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space Complexity of Self-stabilizing Leader Election in Passively-Mobile Anonymous Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to solve the self-stabilizing leader election problem, n states are necessary and sufficient, where n is the number of agents. Thus the problem is unsolvable unless we generalize the population protocol model [8] (see also [25] for a similar result on mediated population protocol).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to solve the self-stabilizing leader election problem, n states are necessary and sufficient, where n is the number of agents. Thus the problem is unsolvable unless we generalize the population protocol model [8] (see also [25] for a similar result on mediated population protocol).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 and Lem. 17) is tight for M ≥ n − |F| − 1 in the model with no mistakes, and for any protocol solving GP.…”
Section: Lower Bound For Gpmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, many other problems could be considered in the framework of population protocols enhanced by the notion of speed, e.g., round-robin token circulation, synchronization, coloring, consensus and leader election (cf. [3,9,15,18,31]). Second, in this first study of cover times, we have assumed that each pair of agents is repeatedly close enough to communicate.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Self-stabilization [13] is an attractive concept to describe such self-repairing properties of an algorithm, and it has been intensively studied already, not only in terms of eventual stabilization but also in terms of guaranteed convergence times (see e.g., the works on time-adaptive self-stabilization such as [24]). Several self-stabilizing leader election protocols have been devised, e.g., [2,9,20] (see also the fault-contained solutions such as [15]). However, none of these approaches allows us to elect a leader in a wireless network that is exposed to harsh interference or even adaptive jamming.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%