Proceedings of the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2015) 2016
DOI: 10.22323/1.236.0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-based gamma-ray astronomy

Abstract: Gamma-ray observations give us a direct view into the most extreme environments of the universe. They help us to study astronomical particle accelerators as supernovae remnants, pulsars, active galaxies or gamma-ray bursts and help us to understand the propagation of cosmic rays through our Milky Way. This article summarizes the status of gamma-ray observations from space; it is the write-up of a rapporteur talk given at the 34 th ICRC in The Hague, The Netherlands. The primary instrument used in the presented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, three catalogs of high-energy gamma-ray sources were published: 1FHL for the energy above 10 GeV [4], 2FHL for the energy range of 50 GeV -2 TeV [5], and 3FHL for the energy range of 10 GeV -2 TeV [6]. Figure 1 [7] shows the percentage of the different types of ~3030 gamma-ray sources according to the 3FGL. However, 33% of gamma-ray sources are unidentified and there no the data in the energy range of 20-100 MeV.…”
Section: Analysis Of Gamma-ray Results According To the Fermi-lat Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, three catalogs of high-energy gamma-ray sources were published: 1FHL for the energy above 10 GeV [4], 2FHL for the energy range of 50 GeV -2 TeV [5], and 3FHL for the energy range of 10 GeV -2 TeV [6]. Figure 1 [7] shows the percentage of the different types of ~3030 gamma-ray sources according to the 3FGL. However, 33% of gamma-ray sources are unidentified and there no the data in the energy range of 20-100 MeV.…”
Section: Analysis Of Gamma-ray Results According To the Fermi-lat Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 2 different strategies to detect gamma rays are very complementary: IACTs have a small field of view, a small duty cycle but very good angular and energy resolution, while particle detectors have a much larger field of view and duty cycle but poor angular resolution in comparison to the IACTs. These two types of detectors are also extremely complementary with (and benefit from) gamma-ray satellites such as Fermi-LAT which is described in an accompanying article giving a status report on space-based gamma-ray astronomy [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%