2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3573507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space- and time-resolved characterization of nanosecond time scale discharge at pressurized gas

Abstract: Nanosecond discharge in dense gases has been the focus of intense research since the 1960's due to the interesting physical phenomena involved and its important practical applications. Plasma produced in such a discharge is used widely for pulsed laser pumping, effective release of energy from microwave compressors, and switching of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
38
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(2 reference statements)
6
38
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the statement that the runaway electron beam formed in atmospheric pressure air is almost monoenergetic (Babich et al, 2014) and is erroneous in our opinion, because the generation of a monoenergetic runaway electron beam varying at gap voltage and varying current through the gap is rather problematic. The data reported in the cited papers contradict both our results (Baksht et al, 2008a;2008b;2009;Tarasenko et al, 2005;2008;2011;2013) and those reported elsewhere (Mesyats et al, 2011;Yatom et al, 2011). In particular, Mesyats et al (2011) consider that the maximum energy for runaway electrons produced in atmospheric pressure air cannot exceed eU m under any conditions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, the statement that the runaway electron beam formed in atmospheric pressure air is almost monoenergetic (Babich et al, 2014) and is erroneous in our opinion, because the generation of a monoenergetic runaway electron beam varying at gap voltage and varying current through the gap is rather problematic. The data reported in the cited papers contradict both our results (Baksht et al, 2008a;2008b;2009;Tarasenko et al, 2005;2008;2011;2013) and those reported elsewhere (Mesyats et al, 2011;Yatom et al, 2011). In particular, Mesyats et al (2011) consider that the maximum energy for runaway electrons produced in atmospheric pressure air cannot exceed eU m under any conditions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…A cathode for such a discharge type has a small curvature radius and the main geometries used are tube, ball, and planar sharp-edge. 6 A common feature of these discharges is high energy runaway electrons (RAEs), which carry out the pre-ionization of the discharge gap. 1 The studies were performed using He, air, Xe, Kr, Ar, and SF 6 gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The common approach to obtaining such a discharge without pre-ionization sources is the application of a high voltage (HV) pulse with amplitude of 50-300 kV and duration of 150 ps-20 ns. [1][2][3] The important feature of this discharge is the non-homogeneity of the electric field distribution in the cathode-anode (CA) gap, which is ensured by the form of the cathode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These EEDF were used as input parameters for the PC simulations described in detail in Ref. 13 for producing x-ray attenuation curves, which were compared with experimental data. These simulations included the electron energy losses in the Ta foil using the data on electron stopping power, 14 and the generation of x-rays is calculated using the forward bremsstrahlung cross-section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%