2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2019.2906789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space/Aerial-Assisted Computing Offloading for IoT Applications: A Learning-Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
244
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 651 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
244
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng et. al [25] investigated the computing offloading problem in a space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) and proposed a deep reinforcement learning-based computing offloading approach to learn the optimal offloading policy on the fly from dynamic SAGIN environments. They also proposed a joint resource allocation and task scheduling approach for unmanned aerial vehicle-based edge servers to allocate the computing resources to virtual machines and schedule the offloading tasks efficiently.…”
Section: A Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et. al [25] investigated the computing offloading problem in a space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) and proposed a deep reinforcement learning-based computing offloading approach to learn the optimal offloading policy on the fly from dynamic SAGIN environments. They also proposed a joint resource allocation and task scheduling approach for unmanned aerial vehicle-based edge servers to allocate the computing resources to virtual machines and schedule the offloading tasks efficiently.…”
Section: A Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the terrestrial RAN, DA-RAN advances in following four aspects: 1) The line-of-sight (LoS) probability for the DBS-to-ground (D2G) wireless link is higher than the terrestrial BS-to-user wireless link [4]. Experiments indicate that LoS links probability is the dominating factor to increase network performance [8]; 2) DBSs can be dynamically deployed and dispatched to different controllers/users with respect to the spatial and temporal traffic variations [9]; 3) unlike connected vehicles whose mobility is controlled by drivers or autonomous driving controller, the trajectories of DBSs can be fully controlled by system providers, which empowers DBSs with the dynamic deployment feature [10] [11]; 4) DBS are capable of executing computing tasks by equipping with CPU or caching modules [12] [13]. However, it is challenging to fully utilize the potential of DBSs due to the following two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the two DNNs is to approximate the Q-value in (12). Based on this Q-value, the UAV chooses an action a t according to the current state s t with the proposed QoS-based ǫ-greedy policy, receives the reward r t+1 , and then transfers to the next state s t+1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%