Trainings- Und Interventionsprogramme Zur Förderung Von Empathie 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48199-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soziales Lernen in der Schule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of empathic skills not only forms the necessary basis for the soft skills called for by a school's training and education goals (Haep & Steins, 2016), but in the extracurricular context also indicates an individual's growing capacity to perceive and understand another person's feelings, thoughts and motives and then act on them commensurately. The purpose of the present study was to test the effectiveness of the empathy fostering program (EPaN) that we developed based on the theory by Hirn and colleagues (2018) adjusted for the needs of the current student body in the mainstream public school system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of empathic skills not only forms the necessary basis for the soft skills called for by a school's training and education goals (Haep & Steins, 2016), but in the extracurricular context also indicates an individual's growing capacity to perceive and understand another person's feelings, thoughts and motives and then act on them commensurately. The purpose of the present study was to test the effectiveness of the empathy fostering program (EPaN) that we developed based on the theory by Hirn and colleagues (2018) adjusted for the needs of the current student body in the mainstream public school system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the effectiveness of training and intervention programs specifically designed to foster empathy in secondary school-age children has been documented, despite inconsistent work definitions in the relevant evaluation studies. This is accomplished by choosing varied methods to generate a positive outcome of gains in empathic capacities, in levels of empathy, or even in prosocial behavior (Haep, Steins, & Wilde, 2014;Haynes & Avery, 1979;Kipper & Ben-Elvy, 1979;Manger, Eikeland, & Asbjornsen, 2001;Pecukonis, 1990). Empathy training is often one of several facets in broader programs (Berhofer, Gonja, & Oberlechner, 2008;McMahon & Washburn, 2003;Schultze-Krumbholz, Zagorscak, Wölfer, & Scheithauer, 2014), which can complicate its integration into regular classes from a school organizational point of view.…”
Section: Deriving the Evaluation Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das Medientagebuchverfahren kam im Projektkontext in einer Einrichtung der stationären Erziehungs-und Eingliederungshilfe sowie in einem Internat zum Einsatz. In beiden Fällen handelt es sich um Bildungsorte mit besonderen räumlich-zeitlichen und sozialen Arrangements, in denen Kinder und Jugendliche überwiegend in öffentlich verantworteter Betreuung und somit in einem besonderen institutionellen und rechtlichen Rahmen leben (Pluto, Schrapper, und Schröer 2021;Haep 2015). In Einrichtungen der stationären Kinder-und Jugendhilfe nach § 34 SGB VIII sind in der Regel junge Menschen mit kumulierten Problemlagen untergebracht, bei denen andere Hilfeformen nicht mehr greifen.…”
Section: Forschungssetting Und Stichprobeunclassified