2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1082310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soziale Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerschafts-Vorsorgeuntersuchungen, beim Rauchen der Mutter während der Schwangerschaft und beim Geburtsgewicht des Neugeborenen. Empirische Analyse auf Basis der Bayerischen Perinatal-Studie

Abstract: The results demonstrate that the data from the perinatal studies are important for public health research. Concerning the risk factors analysed here, large social differences can be observed. In order to show time trends, it would be important to repeat these analyses on a routine basis. From a methodological point of view, it can be stressed that regional differences in health and health care have rarely been looked at in Germany, and that the procedure proposed here provides a new starting point for closing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
4
9
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported differences in use and timing of antenatal care between pregnant women depending on SES and migration background which may lead to an increased risk for adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes for the social disadvantaged [1719, 30]. Our results showed no statistically significant associations between these variables and antenatal IUGR detection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies have reported differences in use and timing of antenatal care between pregnant women depending on SES and migration background which may lead to an increased risk for adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes for the social disadvantaged [1719, 30]. Our results showed no statistically significant associations between these variables and antenatal IUGR detection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast, previous studies based on regional data of the German perinatal database found a less frequent use of antenatal care, in particular for single women with migrant backgrounds [34], women from Eastern Europe and Mediterranean countries [27,30] and a later use of antenatal care among women from the Middle East [29], from Eastern Europe and from Mediterranean countries [30]. In addition, regional differences in the analysis of BQS data indicate that our findings may vary between federal states as well as urban and rural areas within single federal states in Germany.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Women with Turkish origin and immigrant women with a short duration of stay seem to be mainly affected [1,25,26]. Some studies also indicate differences between women with migrant backgrounds compared with women without migrant backgrounds in terms of certain risk factors for stillbirth [27-30]. Nevertheless, nationwide analyses on risk differences of stillbirth for different ethnic groups in Germany are still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nach dem sogenannten Winkler-Index erhält man dann durch Addition der Punktwerte eine Summe zwischen 3 und 21 Punkten. Im letzten Schritt werden die Studienteilnehmer in die 3 Statusgruppen ‚niedrig' (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) Punkte), ‚mittel' (9-14 Punkte) und ‚hoch' (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) Punkte) eingeordnet.…”
Section: Unabhängige Variablenunclassified