Soziale Mischung in der Stadt- und Wohnungspolitik

Harlander, Tilman; Schäfers, Bernhard

doi:10.3224/gwp.v64i1.18252

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Die produktive Stadt solle ihre Produktivität durch "neue Formen von nutzungsgemischten Stadtquartieren" erreichen und für die grüne Stadt wären "städtische Räume, die sich durch Mischnutzung auszeichnen", die Voraussetzung für eine nachhaltige Flächenpolitik. 7 Mischung dominiert also sämtliche an den drei den Säulen der Nachhaltigkeit orientierten Stadt-Idealtypen, die zusammen die Entität der "europäischen Städte" (ob als Bestand oder als Projek- (Harlander 2000), der vom positiven Einfluss der Wohlhabenden auf den "Pöbel" überzeugt gewesen ist. In den Steuerungsversuchen von großen Wohnbaugesellschaften, die eine ethnisch gewollte Zusammensetzung durch Wohnbelegungen herstellen möchten, aber auch in Gesetzen, die geflüchteten Menschen ihr Grundrecht auf freie Wohnortwahl entziehen, manifestieren sich im Mischungsziel wiederum ethnischen Kategorien und deren Rassismen.…”

Section: Die Mischung Der Europäischen Stadtunclassified

Urbane Mixturen

2024

Urban Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zeitgemäße Stadtplanungskonzepte setzen die städtebauliche Mischung als Grundprinzip voraus und erkennen darin eine zwar herausfordernde, aber notwendige Praxis. In der Umsetzung ist sie jedoch umstritten und bleibt oft unerreicht oder im Ergebnis überraschend andersartig. Die Beiträger*innen setzen sich kritisch mit Aspekten der urbanen Mischung und der damit verknüpften Rolle von Architektur und Planung auseinander. Sie beleuchten Widersprüche und Herausforderungen und nennen Beispiele für neuartige Perspektiven und Qualitäten des Urbanen, für deren Sinnhaftigkeit, Erfolg oder Scheitern. Ihre Analysen liefern Grundlagen für das gegenwärtige und zukünftige kollaborative Planen und Bauen.

show abstract

Section: Die Mischung Der Europäischen Stadtunclassified

Urbane Mixturen

2024

Urban Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…‘The myth of social mix’ is a longstanding common sense in German planning and beyond (Bayer et al., 2014; Münch, 2009) that turns on the assumption that ‘the moving in of higher-income earners and of educated middle-class German families supposedly makes neighbourhoods better’ (Holm, in Bayer et al., 2014: 8, translation by author). It is called a myth because it is based on a shaky evidentiary foundation that assumes that the problem for people who live in stigmatized, low-income neighbourhoods is that they live among too many poor and racialized people (for discussion and evidence to the contrary, see Drever, 2004; Harlander, 2012; Holm, 2009; Münch, 2009; Oberwittler, 2007; Saville-Smith et al., 2015; Van Ham, 2012). With this as the problem, mixing offers a solution, as a strategy to attempt control of racialized and poor people through a combination of dispersal and proximity (Kipfer and Goonewardena, 2014), though there is ample evidence that this risks displacement and damaging of neighbourhood networks (cf.…”

Section: ‘The Laboratory Is An Entire District In the City’mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimenting on racialized neighbourhoods: Internationale Bauausstellung Hamburg and the urban laboratory in Hamburg–Wilhelmsburg

Chamberlain

2020

Environ Plan D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ‘urban laboratory’ concept has become a popular discourse and structure for urban projects in recent years. In this article, I ask what the concept achieves in the context of racialized urban disinvestment and stigmatization, with the Hamburg International Building Exhibition’s (Internationale Bauausstellung Hamburg, 2006–2013) work in Hamburg–Wilhelmsburg as an example. Drawing on laboratory studies and urban sociology, I sketch out the laboratory as an ‘imaginative infrastructure’ , including what it offers to the ‘investigators’ who use it. Based on the ‘situatedness’ of the urban laboratory, I argue that the racialization of the neighbourhood and its residents is important to the history of Wilhelmsburg’s planning, and to its recent laboratorization. Laboratorization of racialized people and spaces is not new, but rather has a long history in European colonialism. I conclude that though the experiment in Hamburg–Wilhelmsburg appears to be with the neighbourhood’s racialization itself, there is nothing experimental about attempting the planning myth and common sense of ‘social mix’ to which Internationale Bauausstellung Hamburg contributes. I argue that racialized Wilhelmsburgers deserve problem-solving that does not reinforce existing patterns of development and thus their stigmatization.

show abstract

“…The conservative administration led by Chancellor Helmut Kohl from 1982 onwards directed its efforts towards a withdrawal from welfare-state intervention in the housing market in general (Harlander, 2005). Based on a governmental expert commission's report in 1984, the government officially proclaimed the housing market to be balanced.…”

Section: -Social Housing As Crisis Strategy In Germanymentioning

confidence: 99%

Paradigm Shifts in Social Housing after Welfare‐State Transformation: Learning from the German Experience

Schönig¹

2020

Int J Urban Regional Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Welfare-state transformation and entrepreneurial urban politics in Western welfare states since the late 1970s have yielded converging trends in the transformation of the dominant Fordist paradigm of social housing in terms of its societal function and institutional and spatial form. In this article I draw from a comparative case study on two cities in Germany to show that the resulting new paradigm is simultaneously shaped by the idiosyncrasies of the country's national housing regime and local housing policies. While German governments have successively limited the societal function of social housing as a legitimate instrument only for addressing exceptional housing crises, local policies on providing and organizing social housing within this framework display significant variation. However, planning and design principles dominating the spatial forms of social housing have been congruent. They may be interpreted as both an expression of the marginalization of social housing within the restructured welfare housing regime and a tool of its implementation according to the logics of entrepreneurial urban politics.

show abstract

Soziale Mischung in der Stadt- und Wohnungspolitik

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Urbane Mixturen

Urbane Mixturen

Experimenting on racialized neighbourhoods: Internationale Bauausstellung Hamburg and the urban laboratory in Hamburg–Wilhelmsburg

Paradigm Shifts in Social Housing after Welfare‐State Transformation: Learning from the German Experience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About