2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soybean yield and resource conservation field borders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains unclear whether restoration of a single hedgerow and other small-scale, local restoration strategies can compensate for low complexity at the landscape scale and how far benefits of edge restoration may extend into adjacent fields. Uncertainty as to how hedgerow establishment will alter pest and natural enemy insect communities, and ultimately pest control and crop yield, remain a major barrier to landowners' willingness to devote time and money to hedgerow restorations and other CBC strategies on their farms (Griffiths et al, 2008;Stamps et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains unclear whether restoration of a single hedgerow and other small-scale, local restoration strategies can compensate for low complexity at the landscape scale and how far benefits of edge restoration may extend into adjacent fields. Uncertainty as to how hedgerow establishment will alter pest and natural enemy insect communities, and ultimately pest control and crop yield, remain a major barrier to landowners' willingness to devote time and money to hedgerow restorations and other CBC strategies on their farms (Griffiths et al, 2008;Stamps et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), greater weed and insect pressure, and competition with adjacent vegetation for sunlight, water, and nutrients. Conservation buffers have been shown to have a negligible effect on adjacent crop yield (Barbour 2006;Stamps et al 2008). Furthermore, the implementation of conservation buffers in low-yielding crop margins does not simply displace a preexisting yield reduction associated with field margins (Stamps et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation buffers have been shown to have a negligible effect on adjacent crop yield (Barbour 2006;Stamps et al 2008). Furthermore, the implementation of conservation buffers in low-yielding crop margins does not simply displace a preexisting yield reduction associated with field margins (Stamps et al 2008). Barbour (2006) also found that in circumstances where yield was reduced next to a conservation buffer that the magnitude of reduction was small enough to be offset by the economic gain associated with conservation buffer payments (e.g., SRR and Signup Incentive Payment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the current agricultural land use change from soybean to sugarcane plantations should be prioritized for studies on biodiversity conservation as it can affect not only agricultural fields but also border areas of native vegetation [19]. In order to understand the possible changes on the patterns of distribution and abundance of biodiversity in such conditions, we should first carry out biodiversity inventories in areas where the original ecosystems of the Cerrado biome have been replaced by an agricultural landscape whose matrix is soybean.…”
Section: Sugarcane Expansion In the Cerradomentioning
confidence: 99%