Indeterminate cell histiocytosis (ICH) is a rare and controversial disorder first described by Wood et al 1 in 1985. ICH is characterized by a nonepidermotropic histiocytic infiltrate with immunohistochemical features that overlap with Langerhans cells (LCs) and nonLCs of monocyte-macrophage-dendritic cell lineage.1 It is unclear whether ICH is distinct from Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) or instead represents a variant form of LCH. The gold standard for distinguishing ICH from LCH is demonstration of the absence of Birbeck granules by electron microscopy or, more practically, through use of langerin (CD207) immunohistochemistry (IHC), which is positive in LCH and non-reactive in ICH.2 Although LCH is understood to be a clonal proliferation, there has not been sufficient support for a common molecular pathway in ICH in the literature to date, leading some authors to consider ICH a reactive condition. Herein, we present 3 cases of ICH with a recurrent ETV3-NCOA2 translocation. This molecular finding provides evidence that ICH is a true clonal entity deserving of separate classification.Patient 1 was a 62-year-old woman who presented with a 30-year history of innumerable dome-shaped smooth red and brown papules and nodules scattered diffusely over her face, chest, back, and extremities. Skin biopsy demonstrated a dermal infiltrate of mononuclear histiocytes highlighted by CD1a and CD68 without langerin reactivity. Scattered mature lymphocytes and rare eosinophils were intermixed. S100 was positive in 5% of the histiocytic infiltrate. Electron microscopy confirmed the absence of Birbeck granules. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed by Foundation Medicine (Cambridge, MA) using the previously described FoundationOne assay, 3 and it revealed an ETV3-NCOA2 gene fusion characterized as 59-ETV3(x1-4)1 NCOA2(x14-23)-39 resulting in an aberrant NCOA2. Other aberrant mutations, including those involving the RAS-RAF-MEK pathway, were not found. BRAF V600E IHC was negative. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the ETV3-NCOA2 translocation was positive (Figure 1, inset).Patient 2 was a 51-year-old woman who presented with a severalweek history of diffuse nonpruritic papules involving her arms, legs, neck, scalp, face, chest, and back. Histopathologic examination of a skin biopsy demonstrated a dermal infiltrate composed of mononuclear histiocytes with eosinophilic cytoplasm and admixed mature-appearing lymphocytes. The histiocytes were positive for S100, CD68, and CD1a, whereas langerin and BRAF V600E IHC were negative. FISH testing for the ETV3-NCOA2 translocation was positive (Figure 1).Patient 3 was an 81-year-old man who presented with a solitary lesion on the upper arm which had been present for approximately 6 months. Biopsy showed a multinodular dermal infiltrate of large, oval cells with abundant pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and reniform nuclei. The lesional cells were positive for S100, CD68, and CD1a, whereas langerin and BRAF V600E IHC were negative. FISH testing for the ETV3-NCOA2 translo...