2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOWP: Spatially Ordered and Weighted Patch Descriptor for Visual Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our tracker achieves 36.7% gain in PR and 36.9% gain in SR over Struck [1]. By using a simple patch weighting strategy and training with adaptive scale samples, the performance shows that our tracker provides comparable PR scores, and higher SR score compared with SOWP [3]. PAWSSa tracker improves the SR score by 2.6% considering gradually small changes between frames, PAWSSb improves the SR score by 4.8% by incorporating scales estimated by the external KLT tracker.…”
Section: Online Tracking Benchmark (Otb)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our tracker achieves 36.7% gain in PR and 36.9% gain in SR over Struck [1]. By using a simple patch weighting strategy and training with adaptive scale samples, the performance shows that our tracker provides comparable PR scores, and higher SR score compared with SOWP [3]. PAWSSa tracker improves the SR score by 2.6% considering gradually small changes between frames, PAWSSb improves the SR score by 4.8% by incorporating scales estimated by the external KLT tracker.…”
Section: Online Tracking Benchmark (Otb)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2. Unlike the weighting strategy in [12,3] by analysing the similarities between neighbouring patches, our patch weighting method is simple and straightforward to implement, the weight update for each patch is independent from each other, and only relies on the colour histogram based segmentation model. We show examples of the patch weight evolvement in Figure 1.…”
Section: Probabilistic Segmentation Model For Patch Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the past several decades, it has been common to use a form of well-studied target representations, such as points, lines, and target patches in tracking (Yilmaz et al, 2006, Zhang et al, 2014, Kim et al, 2015. Despite reported success in some benchmark sequences, these methods are sensitive to noise and background clutter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These trackers can be categorized as either generative or discriminative which use appearance-based models to distinguish the target from the background. Researchers have also introduced sophisticated features and descriptors (Kim et al, 2015, Rublee et al, 2011, Zhang et al, 2014, yet there are still many issues in practical applications. The main limitation of these low-level hand-crafted features is that they only address the texture of the object which may frequently change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%