Sovietinio laikotarpio kasdienybės – išgyvenimo strategijos ideologijų sankirtose

Baločkaitė, Rasa

doi:10.15388/socmintvei.2016.1.10307

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Didėjant praeities įvykių suvokimo atstumui, vis labiau intensyvėja socialinių ir humanitarinių mokslų sovietinės praeities tyrimai ir jų publikavimas (Ivanauskas 2006;2015 . Tarp šių tyrimų gausos ne tiek daug sociologiškai ar iš dalies sociologiškai konstruojamų sovietinės praeities ir perėjimo į kitą socialinę sistemą tyrimų (Baločkaitė 2010;2016;Gudžinskas 2012;Norkus 2007;2008a;2008b;2014a;Šaulauskas 1998;2014b;Vaiseta 2014).…”

Section: įVadasunclassified

“…Todėl kritikuojami tiek daugiariopų modernybių konceptualūs trūkumai, tiek empirinis nepagrįstumas bei siūloma alternatyvi sąvoka, kuri taip pat leidžia kalbėti tiek apie modernybę vienaskaita, tiek padeda aiškinti jos variacijas. Modernybių įvairovės koncepcija yra grindžiama kapitalizmo įvairovės paradigma (Hall, Soskice 2001) bei priklausomybės nuo kelio samprata 4 . "Demokratinio politinio proceso rėmuose, -teigia Z. Norkus (2008b: 546), -šalies institucijos gali keistis tik palaipsniui, iš lėto ir konservatyviai -taip, kad kai reformų nebeįmanoma atidėlioti, pasirenkamas toks variantas, kuris mažiausiai nutolsta nuo esamos tvarkos ir tokiu būdu užtikrina nacionalinės tradicijos tęstinumą, o tai ir reiškia institucijų kaitos priklausomybę nuo tako."…”

Section: Daugiariopos Modernybės Ar Modernybės įVairovė?unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soviet Modernity and Modernity of Soviet Period

Leonavičius¹

2020

fil-soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the concept of multiple and entangled modernity that is proposed instead of universal Western-type modernity that is criticized by the modernity discourse. We argue that the concept of multiple modernity is broadened by the concept of entangled modernity. The latter explains the multiplicity of modernities and the theoretical possibility of a certain universal model of modern society through the global interaction of societies. From the point of view of entangled modernity, a certain universality of societies arises not from the structural evolution of society itself, but from the interaction of modern and pre-modern societies. The concept of entangled modernity allows one to analytically distinguish between the Soviet modernity and the Soviet period modernity, which can be used to describe the modern Lithuanian society of the Soviet period. The modern Lithuanian society of the Soviet period is the result of an interaction of the modern Lithuanian society with the Soviet project of modern society that was forcibly implemented by local social agents of the occupied society.

show abstract

Section: įVadasunclassified

Section: Daugiariopos Modernybės Ar Modernybės įVairovė?unclassified

Soviet Modernity and Modernity of Soviet Period

Leonavičius¹

2020

fil-soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In further periods of a person's life, other adaptors became important, such as the political party, the party committee at the workplace, labour unions and cultural collectives at the workplace. Even though recent research claims that people ignored, rather than internalized or resisted, the ideological principles of the state-controlled organizations (Baločkaitė, 2016), this article discusses the person's ability to distance oneself from ideological socialization.…”

Section: What Is Ideology In a Totalitarian Society? Social Control Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Memories of Discipline in Soviet Lithuania: Stories in Oral History

Ulinskaitė

2019

Baltic Journal of Political Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Totalitarian regimes attempt to restrict and control virtually every aspect of human life. Interestingly, conscious reflection on disciplinary practises takes up only a small part of the life-stories of interviewed Lithuanians, as far as the memory of the post-Stalin era is concerned. The interviews that form the foundation for this paper were conducted during the summer of 2017 in three different districts in Lithuania. The article aims to answer the following two research questions:1) Which mechanisms of discipline did people recognize and reflect upon?2) How were disciplinary actions remembered and described?According to interviews, tangible individuals filled the role of disciplinarians in schools and workplaces. In addition, the responsibility for discipline and control lies within the imperceptible disciplinarian, supplemented by the invisible discipline of the collective. This led to overwhelming uncertainty in the society, where people invoked intuition and interpretations of who is trustworthy to adapt to uncertain situations. The greatest impact of the totalitarian discipline was that people effectively internalized it and consequently became their own most significant disciplinarians.

show abstract

Sovietinio laikotarpio kasdienybės – išgyvenimo strategijos ideologijų sankirtose

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Soviet Modernity and Modernity of Soviet Period

Soviet Modernity and Modernity of Soviet Period

Memories of Discipline in Soviet Lithuania: Stories in Oral History

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About