2000
DOI: 10.1006/hmat.1999.2261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet Mathematics and Dialectics in the Stalin Era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Po trzecie, podkreślano praktyczne zastosowania matematyki w nauce i inżynierii. Powoływanie się na owe trzy dogmaty miało zapewniać matematykom spokojną pracę w ramach radzieckiego systemu politycznego 10 .…”
Section: Logika I Matematyka Pod Dyktatem Diamatu I Późniejsze Próby Rewizjiunclassified
“…Po trzecie, podkreślano praktyczne zastosowania matematyki w nauce i inżynierii. Powoływanie się na owe trzy dogmaty miało zapewniać matematykom spokojną pracę w ramach radzieckiego systemu politycznego 10 .…”
Section: Logika I Matematyka Pod Dyktatem Diamatu I Późniejsze Próby Rewizjiunclassified
“…In 1936, when Communist leaders began to complain, in the context of a campaign against Kolmogorov's teacher Nikolai Luzin, about the Moscow mathematicians' publishing their best work in the West (Demidov and Pevshin 1999;Vucinich 2000;Lorentz 2002, p. 205), Kolmogorov had his student Grigory Bavli translate the Grundbegriffe into Russian. An English translation, by Nathan Morrison, was published in 1950, with a second edition in 1956.…”
Section: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Chuprov and Slutsky worked in economics and statistics, von Mises was an applied mathematician, concerned more with aerodynamics than social science, and the relevance of his work on Kollektivs to physics had been established in the Soviet literature by Khinchin in 1929 (see also Khinchin, 1961, andSiegmund-Schultze, 2004). (For more information on the political context, see Blum and Mespoulet 2003;Lorentz 2002;Mazliak 2003;Seneta 2003;Vucinich 1999Vucinich , 2000Vucinich , 2002) Certainly, however, Kolmogorov's high regard for von Mises's theory of Kollektivs was sincere. It emerged again in the 1960s, as a motivation for Kolmogorov's thinking about the relation between algorithmic complexity and probability (Cover et al 1989, Vovk andShafer 2003).…”
Section: The Philosophical Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le cas le plus célèbre est naturellement celui de la génétique, étudié en détail dans[Krementsov 1997]. Il ne faut pas penser cependant que des disciplines plus abstraites, comme les mathématiques, ont été épargnées comme le montre[Vucinich 2000]. Dans[Mazliak 2018a], on voit aussi comment une économiste idéologue détourne un concept scientifique (la loi des grands nombres) pour en faire un agenda politique.…”
unclassified