Sovereignty in Dispute

Hoffmann, Fritz L.; Hoffmann, Olga Mingo

doi:10.4324/9780429306853

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even though it was only a minor event at the time, such a move nearly precipitated a dangerous military confrontation. 114 Following the Operation Condor incident, as this came to be known, the islanders became worried about an Argentine assault or unofªcial landings. 115 This led the British to deploy the Royal Marines on the islands (and subsequently increase their presence), to dispatch frigate HMS Puma from Cape Town, and to establish a British naval presence in the wider South Atlantic region.…”

Section: The Case Of the Falklands/malvinasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Words Matter: The Effect of Moral Language on International Bargaining

Post¹

2023

International Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does moral language affect international bargaining? When countries rely on moral language to frame a disputed issue, they decrease the probability of peaceful compromise and increase the probability of the dispute escalating with military action. This language operates through two pathways. First, moral language prejudices domestic audiences against compromise over the disputed issue, thereby limiting the options available to negotiators during bargaining. Second, moral language prompts the dispute opponent to also utilize moral arguments to defend its position. The ensuing moral debate moralizes both sets of domestic audiences, consequently reducing opportunities for compromise and narrowing the bargaining range. Negotiated concessions then frustrate the bargaining opponent and elicit accusations of hypocrisy from domestic audiences for compromising on the principle at stake. This backlash triggers crises and pressures the government to stand firm on its previously principled (and uncompromising) position, increasing the probability of military escalation. An examination of the effects of moral language on negotiation breakdown and dispute escalation in the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas case probes the theory. The findings illustrate how moral language can shape a government's behavior far into the future, constraining its ability to broker a peaceful compromise.

show abstract

Section: The Case Of the Falklands/malvinasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Words Matter: The Effect of Moral Language on International Bargaining

Post¹

2023

International Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… Leone, 2008, 98-101, 143-49, with previous bibliography. 52 Notable publications includeEimer;Hoffmann; …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Innocent X Pamphilj's Architectural Network in Rome

Leone

Vierthaler

2020

Renaiss. Q.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study employs network analysis and microhistory to challenge the standard narrative about architecture and patronage in Baroque Rome, that of celebrity patron-artist relationships. It investigates the artists and artisans below this elite team and the plurality of relationships that developed among them. The subject is Innocent X Pamphilj's monumental works of art and architecture, at the Vatican, Piazza Navona, Campidoglio, Lateran, and Janiculum Hill, commissioned for the 1650 Holy Year. It argues that competent artisans and their relationships influenced the operation of building sites and presents Innocent X as the patron of an industrious architectural enterprise.

show abstract

Factionalizing War

Roberts-Miller

2024

Deliberating War

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sovereignty in Dispute

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Words Matter: The Effect of Moral Language on International Bargaining

Words Matter: The Effect of Moral Language on International Bargaining

Innocent X Pamphilj's Architectural Network in Rome

Factionalizing War

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About