2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.101418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sovereign wealth funds: Past, present and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest threat is seen in concerns that states that own SWFs would exert political influence. Concerning this scenario, we lean towards Bahoo's [8] conclusion that the goal of SWFs "is to increase their portfolios' returns rather than advance a political agenda." The varying levels of SWF transparency relate to this issue, which is primarily valid for less transparent funds, established as a rule in Arab nations, China, and less developed countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The greatest threat is seen in concerns that states that own SWFs would exert political influence. Concerning this scenario, we lean towards Bahoo's [8] conclusion that the goal of SWFs "is to increase their portfolios' returns rather than advance a political agenda." The varying levels of SWF transparency relate to this issue, which is primarily valid for less transparent funds, established as a rule in Arab nations, China, and less developed countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, in comparison with other alternative asset managers (private equity, hedge fund, and others) and together with the size of individual countries' foreign exchange reserves, we can discuss the increasing influence of SWFs. A number of authors deal with their continually increasing importance, addressing more than merely the growing size of their managed assets [3,5,6,7,8]. Moreover, Kotter and Lel [6] state, "their objectives and behaviour are not well understood."…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were 32 conceptual papers, which were omitted. It is interesting to note that out of (150–32) 128 papers, only 97 papers had a few common factors that appeared in more than 2 studies for inclusion in our meta-analytic review, as factors appearing in single studies need not be synthesized to determine the overall size of their effect (Bahoo et al , 2020b). The papers were considered based on three different criteria for conducting the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%