The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1306/03291817263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southern Gulf of Mexico Wilcox source to sink: Investigating and predicting Paleogene Wilcox reservoirs in eastern Mexico deep-water areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, researchers used these observed differences to develop a set of stratigraphic nomenclatures tied to lithostratigraphic packages, seismic sequences, and sediment flux rates (e.g., Lower/Middle/Upper; Galloway et al, 2000) that are useful for source-to-sink system analysis (Snedden et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). Chronostratigraphic frameworks were first developed with inclusion of data from deep-water environs (Zarra et al, 2003; and subsequent refinements to biostratigraphic zonation and correlation to absolute age constraints from numerous onshore and offshore well data has led to a generally 130 accepted age range for Wilcox Group deposition of 61.5-51.1 Ma, spanning nannofossil biozones NP5 to NP12 with the PETM located near the NP9-NP10 boundary (Zarra et al, 2019).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, researchers used these observed differences to develop a set of stratigraphic nomenclatures tied to lithostratigraphic packages, seismic sequences, and sediment flux rates (e.g., Lower/Middle/Upper; Galloway et al, 2000) that are useful for source-to-sink system analysis (Snedden et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). Chronostratigraphic frameworks were first developed with inclusion of data from deep-water environs (Zarra et al, 2003; and subsequent refinements to biostratigraphic zonation and correlation to absolute age constraints from numerous onshore and offshore well data has led to a generally 130 accepted age range for Wilcox Group deposition of 61.5-51.1 Ma, spanning nannofossil biozones NP5 to NP12 with the PETM located near the NP9-NP10 boundary (Zarra et al, 2019).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large volume of eroded material spilled over the partially A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T eroded Tamaulipas Arch into the Salina del Bravo and Tampico-Misantla Basin in the late Eocene to Miocene.Eocene to Oligocene Gravity Tectonics along the East Mexican marginTectonic elevation of the Laramide (US) and Mexican orogens during the Palaeocene initiated a major increase in sedimentation rate after ca. 65 Ma(Galloway 2008, Snedden et al 2018. The catchment area of the Rio Bravo and Colorado rivers extended to the Rocky Mountains in Colorado(Snedden et al 2018) and these rivers transported coarse clastic material from across the North American continent into the Burgos Basin and the Salina del Bravo where it was deposited as the Wilcox Formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Ma(Galloway 2008, Snedden et al 2018. The catchment area of the Rio Bravo and Colorado rivers extended to the Rocky Mountains in Colorado(Snedden et al 2018) and these rivers transported coarse clastic material from across the North American continent into the Burgos Basin and the Salina del Bravo where it was deposited as the Wilcox Formation. In the US sector the Wilcox Formation has been dated from 61.5-51.1 Ma(Zarra et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the modern setting of the Sureste Basin, we infer that the shelf was relatively narrow, less than 30 km in a shore‐normal distance, reflecting a steep gradient at this tectonically active margin. Other studies of the Miocene in this and adjacent areas have hypothesized steep and narrow shelf and slope areas (Ambrose et al., 2005; Snedden & Galloway, 2019; Snedden, Tinker, et al., 2018). We hypothesize that Upper Miocene sediments episodically bypassed the narrow shelf at the Cibix‐1 shelf edge delta and continued down slope to sites further basinward at Zama and points north.…”
Section: Regional Palaeogeographic Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 70%