2019
DOI: 10.22179/revmacn.21.626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southern beech (Nothofagaceae) fossil leaves from the Río Turbio Formation (Eocene–?Oligocene), Santa Cruz Province, Argentina.

Abstract: Nothofagus Blume belongs to the monogeneric family Nothofagaceae and includes 43 extant species of trees (Christenhusz & Byng, 2016) grouped in four monophyletic subgenera (Hill & Read, 1991). The temperate subgenera (Nothofagus, Lophozonia and Fuscospora) are mainly distributed in temperate regions of the Southern Hemisphere (New Zealand, Australia and South America) with some taxa (subgenus Brassospora) extending northward into the tropics (New Guinea and New Caledonia). In South America, Nothofagaceae is re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest a latest Eocene through Oligocene age (this work) for the upper Río Turbio Formation. This interpretation is also more compatible with paleobotanical data that suggest mesothermal conditions at high latitude, based on the abundance and diversity of fossilized Nothofagus morphotype leaf impressions and wood fragments (Hünicken, 1955;Panti, 2019;Pujana and Ruiz, 2019). Whereas the warm early to middle Eocene conditions in Patagonia 366 favored high tropical to subtropical (mega/mesothermal) plant diversity (Wilf et al, 2003;Panti, 2014Panti, , 2020, the late Eocene-Oligocene transition ushered forth increased diversification and abundance of meso-and microthermal floral elements across southern Gondwana, including the widespread dominion of genus Nothofagus (Acosta et al, 2014;Vento and Prámparo, 2018;Panti, 2019;Pujana and Ruiz, 2019).…”
Section: The Subaqueous Deltaic Lower Río Turbio Formation Contains Dsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest a latest Eocene through Oligocene age (this work) for the upper Río Turbio Formation. This interpretation is also more compatible with paleobotanical data that suggest mesothermal conditions at high latitude, based on the abundance and diversity of fossilized Nothofagus morphotype leaf impressions and wood fragments (Hünicken, 1955;Panti, 2019;Pujana and Ruiz, 2019). Whereas the warm early to middle Eocene conditions in Patagonia 366 favored high tropical to subtropical (mega/mesothermal) plant diversity (Wilf et al, 2003;Panti, 2014Panti, , 2020, the late Eocene-Oligocene transition ushered forth increased diversification and abundance of meso-and microthermal floral elements across southern Gondwana, including the widespread dominion of genus Nothofagus (Acosta et al, 2014;Vento and Prámparo, 2018;Panti, 2019;Pujana and Ruiz, 2019).…”
Section: The Subaqueous Deltaic Lower Río Turbio Formation Contains Dsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These depositional ages are compatible with middle Eocene age estimates from dinoflagellate cyst biozonation, ranging from 46-39 Ma (Zone I of González Estebenet et al, 2015;and RTF 1 and 2 from González Estebenet et al, 2017), leaf impressions, shark teeth, and marine invertebrate fossils recovered from these deposits (Griffin, 1991;Otero et al, 2013;Otero and Soto-Acuña, 2015;Panti, 2019Panti, , 2020. Moreover, these strata show similar age, sedimentary facies, fossil content, and mineral composition to those of its northern equivalent in the Man Aike Formation near Lago Argentino (Marenssi et al, 2002;Casadío et al, 2009;Rodríguez Raising, 2010;Cuitiño et al, 2019) and Sierra Baguales (Ugalde, 2014;Gutiérrez et al, 2017), pointing to stratigraphic correlation of a regional, renewed depositional phase of foreland sedimentation across the Paleocene unconformity surface (George et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Subaqueous Deltaic Lower Río Turbio Formation Contains Dsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For the systematics of each morphospecies, the proposed (APG IV, 2016) classification of angiosperms was followed. Taxonomic determinations were made through literature review and comparison of material from other taphofloras described for Patagonia and Antarctica (i.e., Berry, 1925, 1937; Caviglia, 2019; Caviglia & Zamaloa, 2014; Dusén, 1899; Dutra, 2001; Frenguelli, 1941; Hünicken, 1967; Panti, 2011, 2019; Tosolini et al., 2013; Vento et al., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%