2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137463814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southern Anthropology - a History of Fison and Howitt’s Kamilaroi and Kurnai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case, as we have noted, in its early history the term ramparr has a wider meaning of an avoidance relationship which encompassed several types of in-laws who may also be designated by more specific kinship terms, probably emerging from an original concrete meaning of 'barrier' extended metaphorically (McConvell 2015). This may be then a case of a term in which there is what we might call hypopolysemy.…”
Section: Change Of Gender Of +1 (Parental/affinal) Generation Termsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this case, as we have noted, in its early history the term ramparr has a wider meaning of an avoidance relationship which encompassed several types of in-laws who may also be designated by more specific kinship terms, probably emerging from an original concrete meaning of 'barrier' extended metaphorically (McConvell 2015). This may be then a case of a term in which there is what we might call hypopolysemy.…”
Section: Change Of Gender Of +1 (Parental/affinal) Generation Termsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This kind of restriction of cross-parallel neutralisation to the zero generation rather than the 'Hawaiian' system where there are no cross-parallel distinctions in any generation, is not uncommon world-wide: Gertrude Dole called it 'bifurcate generational ' (1969: 118). Fison and Howitt did not have linguistic or convincing ethnological evidence of this direction of change in Gippsland but relied on assumptions that the Dravidianate systems elsewhere must have been primordial on the one hand, and a highly speculative story of how people arrived in Gippsland on the other (Fison and Howitt 1880;Gardner and McConvell 2015). Intriguingly, Lorimer Fison later rejected his own story about this, claiming that he had received 'new evidence'-but there is no account of this evidence (Fison 1892). In the Western Desert, the so-called 'Aluridja' system also features crossparallel neutralisation in the zero generation, but as Laurent Dousset (2003) has shown, it is actually a contextual overlay used to talk about people who are not marriageable, and this often depends on the state of relations between groups, not hard and fast rules.…”
Section: Loss Of Cross-parallel Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This kind of restriction of cross-parallel neutralisation to the zero generation rather than the 'Hawaiian' system where there are no cross-parallel distinctions in any generation, is not uncommon world-wide: Gertrude Dole called it 'bifurcate generational ' (1969: 118). 9 9 Fison and Howitt did not have linguistic or convincing ethnological evidence of this direction of change in Gippsland but relied on assumptions that the Dravidianate systems elsewhere must have been primordial on the one hand, and a highly speculative story of how people arrived in Gippsland on the other (Fison and Howitt 1880;Gardner and McConvell 2015). Intriguingly, Lorimer Fison later rejected his own story about this, claiming that he had received 'new evidence'-but there is no account of this evidence (Fison 1892). In the Western Desert, the so-called 'Aluridja' system also features crossparallel neutralisation in the zero generation, but as Laurent Dousset (2003) has shown, it is actually a contextual overlay used to talk about people who are not marriageable, and this often depends on the state of relations between groups, not hard and fast rules.…”
Section: Loss Of Cross-parallel Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…424-50) raised the possibility that 'invaders' brought in totems and moieties. On other occasions, Fison and Howitt insisted that sections must have been ancient, dating from the time of humans first occupying and spreading out across Australia (Gardner & McConvell 2015).…”
Section: Challenges To Social Evolutionismmentioning
confidence: 99%