2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-007-0687-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southeast Asian ticks (Acari: Ixodida): a historical perspective

Abstract: Our knowledge of the species of ticks present in Southeast Asia is good, particularly due to the vast amount of work from the 1960s to the 1980s by Hoogstraal and colleagues. Unfortunately, this knowledge is scattered throughout the specialist literature, and there is currently no synopsis available. In addition, our knowledge of the tick fauna of several countries, for example Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, is very limited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ticks are prevalent worldwide from Asia (Haque et al, 2011;Bilkis et al, 2011;Sajid et al, 2011;Razmi and Ramoon, 2012;Singh and Rath, 2013), Africa (Reye et al, 2012;Tiki and Mekonnen, 2011;Elghali and Hassan, 2012), North and South Americas (Guimaraes et al, 2001;Lohmeyer et al, 2011), Australia (Springell, 1974;Kamau, 2011) and Europe (Kirby et al, 2004;Scharlemann et al, 2008). Ticks not only cause direct losses, but also act as vectors for various pathogens of bacterial, rickettsial, protozoal, and viral origin (Petney et al, 2007). The direct production losses caused by ticks include loss of milk production, reduced weight gain (Peter et al, 2005;Sajid et al, 2007), low quality skins and hides (Jongejan and Uilenberg, 2004), and mortality (Niyonzema and Kiltz, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ticks are prevalent worldwide from Asia (Haque et al, 2011;Bilkis et al, 2011;Sajid et al, 2011;Razmi and Ramoon, 2012;Singh and Rath, 2013), Africa (Reye et al, 2012;Tiki and Mekonnen, 2011;Elghali and Hassan, 2012), North and South Americas (Guimaraes et al, 2001;Lohmeyer et al, 2011), Australia (Springell, 1974;Kamau, 2011) and Europe (Kirby et al, 2004;Scharlemann et al, 2008). Ticks not only cause direct losses, but also act as vectors for various pathogens of bacterial, rickettsial, protozoal, and viral origin (Petney et al, 2007). The direct production losses caused by ticks include loss of milk production, reduced weight gain (Peter et al, 2005;Sajid et al, 2007), low quality skins and hides (Jongejan and Uilenberg, 2004), and mortality (Niyonzema and Kiltz, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kene dağılımının ortaya konulması amacıyla, dünyanın hemen her bölgesinde, kene ile ilgili araştırmalar yapılmaktadır (4)(5)(6). Ancak kene dağılımını etkileyen faktörlere bağlı olarak kene dağılımında sık olarak değişiklikler meydana geldiği için bilgilerin araştırma programları ile düzenli olarak güncellenmesi gereklidir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In this study, Haemaphysalis, the most species-rich tick genus in Southeast Asia (52 Haemaphysalis species are known from this region, over 30% of the world haemaphysalid fauna) (Petney et al, 2007), was the dominant genus found in the forests of the WMPA area. Among tick genera, Haemaphysalis is cited as an example of tick-host coevolution through the preservation of primitive (Aponomma-like) structures in some species, their manifestation of structural differences in each developmental stage, as well as structural differences between the sexes of individual species (Hoogstraal et al, 1985a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In Southeast Asia, taxonomically accurate information on tick species is limited, and the tick-borne diseases of this region remain poorly characterized. Historically, about 104 species of ticks, representing 12 genera, have been known to occur in Southeast Asia (Petney et al, 2007), with the recent addition of two new species of Dermacentor (Apanaskevich et al, 2015a, Apanaskevich et al, 2015b. The relationship between ticks and tickborne pathogens in the region is largely unknown, even though the presence of these pathogens has been recognized for many years and the number of new pathogens discovered in ticks has increased markedly (Yu et al, 2011, Kernif et al, 2012, Kho et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%