2009
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“South Dakota's Dying to Know”: A Statewide Survey about End of Life

Abstract: Disparities between what South Dakotans want at EOL and what actions they have taken to address those preferences challenge individuals, families, and professionals to engage in conversation to redress this inconsistency. Receptivity to physician-initiated EOL conversations suggests this talk be included with all patients, not just those who are elderly or at EOL. Data from this statewide study of community-dwelling adults provide information to better understand EOL preferences and to inform health policy and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Its holistic, person-centered approach, interdisciplinary involvement, and focus on pain and symptom management are often considered preferable to other care alternatives such as curative treatments (eg, radiation, chemotherapy, surgery) or artificial life-support. 3–5 However, more than 40% of individuals who are eligible for hospice care actually receive it; 6 and, after receiving a life-limiting prognosis, disproportionately lower numbers of qualifying African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics enroll in hospice. 7,8 Public misconceptions and lack of information about hospice are considered important reasons why many patients and families forego these services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Its holistic, person-centered approach, interdisciplinary involvement, and focus on pain and symptom management are often considered preferable to other care alternatives such as curative treatments (eg, radiation, chemotherapy, surgery) or artificial life-support. 3–5 However, more than 40% of individuals who are eligible for hospice care actually receive it; 6 and, after receiving a life-limiting prognosis, disproportionately lower numbers of qualifying African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics enroll in hospice. 7,8 Public misconceptions and lack of information about hospice are considered important reasons why many patients and families forego these services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some barriers relate to patients, such as misconceptions about pain and treatments (Schrader, Nelson, & Eidsness, 2009), fears and concerns about pain medications and side effects, reluctance to report pain and symptoms, and complexity of the symptom experience. Other barriers relate to providers, such as lack of knowledge, skills, and time for adequate pain and symptom assessment (Fineberg, Wenger, & Brown-Saltzman, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 When individuals are asked their own preferences (as opposed to what they would want for a family member), sizeable majorities would refuse feeding tubes at the end of life. 47,48 Yet many physicians believe that the feeding tube represents the standard of care and are unaware of data showing its lack of benefit. 49 Aided by market forces, public opinion created an institutional environment in which it was nearly impossible to implement the lessons of ethics and palliative care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%