South Carolina's forests

Tansey, John B.; Hutchins, Cecil C.

doi:10.2737/se-rb-103

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

A New Way To Monitor Forest Resources1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1998

2004

Publication Types

Select...

Other2

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The eighth survey of South Carolina's forests marks an important shift from its predecessors, both in the scope of its measurements and in its timeliness. The first seven surveys provided valuable information about timberland-area, volumes, and growth-to-removal relationships (Conner 1998, Tansey andHutchins 1988)-but only a cursory assessment of the ecological relationships that influence forest health. Previous survey cycles ranged from 6 to 10 years, depending on fluctuations in Federal budgets and staffing.…”

Section: A New Way To Monitor Forest Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The state of South Carolina's forests, 2001

Conner¹,

Adams²,

Butler³

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: A New Way To Monitor Forest Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The state of South Carolina's forests, 2001

Conner¹,

Adams²,

Butler³

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Procedures we developed after Hurricane Hugo struck South Carolina on September 21, 1989, were significantly different from those we followed to conduct the Hurricane Camille assessment. In assessing damage from Hurricane Hugo (Sheffield and Thompson 1992), we used permanent FIA plots in 23 South Carolina counties and corresponding data from the 1986 field survey (Tansey and Hutchins 1988).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%